Parameter Refinement of a Ballbot and Predictive Control for Reference Tracking with Linear Parameter-Varying Embedding

In this study, we implement a control method for stabilizing a ballbot that simultaneously follows a reference. We start the analysis by embedding the nonlinear dynamic model derived from first principles to a linear parameter-varying (LPV) formulation. Continuously, and as an extension of a past study, we refine the parameters of the nonlinear model, which significantly enhances its accuracy compared to the linear model. The crucial advantages of the LPV formulation are that it consists of a nonlinear predictor that can be used in model predictive control (LPV-MPC) by retaining the convexity of the quadratic optimization problem with linear constraints and further evades computational burdens that appear in other nonlinear MPC (NMPC) methods with only a slight loss in performance. The LPV-MPC control method can be solved efficiently as a quadratic program (QP) that provides timing that supports real-time implementation. We test the control designs for 1D non-smooth and 2D smooth references (e.g., Lissajous curves). Finally, theoretical guarantees such as stability and recursive feasibility are provided for a single-set point reference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ccta60707.2024.10666650
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parameter Refinement of a Ballbot and Predictive Control for Reference Tracking with Linear Parameter-Varying Embedding

Dimitrios S. Karachalios, Hossam S. Abbas
1 citations
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
0.33
article

Parameter Refinement of a Ballbot and Predictive Control for Reference Tracking with Linear Parameter-Varying Embedding

Dimitrios S. Karachalios, Hossam S. Abbas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, we implement a control method for stabilizing a ballbot that simultaneously follows a reference. We start the analysis by embedding the nonlinear dynamic model derived from first principles to a linear parameter-varying (LPV) formulation. Continuously, and as an extension of a past study, we refine the parameters of the nonlinear model, which significantly enhances its accuracy compared to the linear model. The crucial advantages of the LPV formulation are that it consists of a nonlinear predictor that can be used in model predictive control (LPV-MPC) by retaining the convexity of the quadratic optimization problem with linear constraints and further evades computational burdens that appear in other nonlinear MPC (NMPC) methods with only a slight loss in performance. The LPV-MPC control method can be solved efficiently as a quadratic program (QP) that provides timing that supports real-time implementation. We test the control designs for 1D non-smooth and 2D smooth references (e.g., Lissajous curves). Finally, theoretical guarantees such as stability and recursive feasibility are provided for a single-set point reference.

Vol. 160
University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.