Differences among the total electron content derived by radio occultation, global ionospheric maps and satellite altimetry

Abstract In recent years, significant progress has been in ionospheric modeling research through data ingestion and data assimilation from a variety of sources, including ground-based global navigation satellite systems, space-based radio occultation and satellite altimetry (SA). Given the diverse observing geometries, vertical data coverages and intermission biases among different measurements, it is imperative to evaluate their absolute accuracies and estimate systematic biases to determine reasonable weights and error covariances when constructing ionospheric models. This study specifically investigates the disparities among the vertical total electron content (VTEC) derived from SA data of the Jason and Sentinel missions, the integrated VTEC from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC) and global ionospheric maps (GIMs). To mitigate the systematic bias resulting from differences in satellite altitudes, the vertical ranges of various VTECs are mapped to a standardized height. The results indicate that the intermission bias of SA-derived VTEC remains relatively stable, with Jason-1 serving as a benchmark for mapping other datasets. The mean bias between COSMIC and SA-derived VTEC is minimal, suggesting good agreement between these two space-based techniques. However, COSMIC and GIM VTEC exhibit remarkable seasonal discrepancies, influenced by the solar activity variations. Moreover, GIMs demonstrate noticeable hemispheric asymmetry and a degradation in accuracy ranging from 0.7 to 1.7 TECU in the ocean-dominant Southern Hemisphere. While space-based observations effectively illustrate phenomena such as the Weddell Sea anomaly and longitudinal ionospheric characteristics, GIMs tend to exhibit a more pronounced mid-latitude electron density enhancement structure.