A Study on Comparison of Investment Value Assessment Methods for Prioritizing Investment in Power Equipment

For utility companies that own power grids, it is crucial not only to generate revenue through power supply services but also to efficiently manage their power facility assets to reduce unnecessary expenditures. In particular, if unforeseen accidents occur due to the deterioration or failure of power facilities, it is important for utility companies to prevent critical risks such as incurring costs for damage compensation and a decline in social image, in line with their obligation to provide a stable power supply. To this end, it is essential for utility companies to develop strategies for the replacement of power facilities in addition to continuous maintenance. In this paper, NPV(Net Present Value) and BCR(Benefit-Cost Ratio) methods to prioritizing investment in power facilities are compared and analyzed in terms of cables, transformers, and lightning arresters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5370/kiee.2024.73.8.1404
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Comparison of Investment Value Assessment Methods for Prioritizing Investment in Power Equipment

Jeong-Sik Oh, Tae‐Sik Park, Seung-yoon Sophia Lee, Byeong-Hyeon An et al.
1 citations
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Technology Assessment and Management
0.36
article

A Study on Comparison of Investment Value Assessment Methods for Prioritizing Investment in Power Equipment

Jeong-Sik Oh, Tae‐Sik Park, Seung-yoon Sophia Lee, Byeong-Hyeon An, Taehoon Kim, Seon-Woo Lim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For utility companies that own power grids, it is crucial not only to generate revenue through power supply services but also to efficiently manage their power facility assets to reduce unnecessary expenditures. In particular, if unforeseen accidents occur due to the deterioration or failure of power facilities, it is important for utility companies to prevent critical risks such as incurring costs for damage compensation and a decline in social image, in line with their obligation to provide a stable power supply. To this end, it is essential for utility companies to develop strategies for the replacement of power facilities in addition to continuous maintenance. In this paper, NPV(Net Present Value) and BCR(Benefit-Cost Ratio) methods to prioritizing investment in power facilities are compared and analyzed in terms of cables, transformers, and lightning arresters.

The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical EngineersVol. 73(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Technology Assessment and Management
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on Comparison of Investment Value Assessment Methods for Prioritizing Investment in Power Equipment — Jeong-Sik Oh, Tae‐Sik Park, et al. · The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS