Description of practices adopted in response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreaks among breeding herds in the United States from 2019-2021

Objectives: Describe and benchmark strategies and practices used in the field across the United States to control and eliminate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in response to PRRS outbreaks from 2019 to 2021. Materials and methods: A voluntary survey was used to collect information on practices implemented in response to PRRS outbreaks in different herds from 2019 to 2021. Information about herd demographic characteristics, biomanagement practices, diagnostic test and testing results, and production data were collected, collated, standardized, and described according to the herd’s outbreak characteristics. Results: A diversity of biomanagement practices were observed among 86 herd outbreaks. The median time to stability (TTS) was 38.0 weeks (interquartile range (IQR), 32.0-49.0 weeks), and time to baseline productivity (TTBP) was 22.0 weeks (IQR, 15.0-26.0 weeks). The median total production losses (TL) was 3675 pigs per 1000 sows (IQR, 2356-6845 pigs per 1000 sows); TTS and TTBP were longer and TL higher than a study reported ten years ago (26.6 weeks, 16.5 weeks, and 2217 pigs/1000 sows, respectively). Herd closure strategy, herd interventions such as live virus inoculation and modified-live virus vaccine, and biomanagement strategies to reduce virus transmission among sows and pigs were inconsistent among the studied herds. Implications: Under the conditions of this study, management practices used during PRRS outbreaks were highly diverse among herds. In addition, herd closure, interventions, and biomanagement strategies were inconsistent. The TTS and TTBP were longer, and TL was higher than reported 10 years ago.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Swine Health and Production
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1384
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Animal Virus Infections Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Description of practices adopted in response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreaks among breeding herds in the United States from 2019-2021

Rodrigo Cauduro Dias de Paiva, Giovani Trevisan, Daniel Linhares, Ana Paula Silva et al.
4 citations
Journal of Swine Health and Production
Animal Virus Infections Studies
1.36
article

Description of practices adopted in response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreaks among breeding herds in the United States from 2019-2021

Rodrigo Cauduro Dias de Paiva, Giovani Trevisan, Daniel Linhares, Ana Paula Silva, Gustavo Silva, Tina Peterson, Christopher Rademacher
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Describe and benchmark strategies and practices used in the field across the United States to control and eliminate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in response to PRRS outbreaks from 2019 to 2021. Materials and methods: A voluntary survey was used to collect information on practices implemented in response to PRRS outbreaks in different herds from 2019 to 2021. Information about herd demographic characteristics, biomanagement practices, diagnostic test and testing results, and production data were collected, collated, standardized, and described according to the herd’s outbreak characteristics. Results: A diversity of biomanagement practices were observed among 86 herd outbreaks. The median time to stability (TTS) was 38.0 weeks (interquartile range (IQR), 32.0-49.0 weeks), and time to baseline productivity (TTBP) was 22.0 weeks (IQR, 15.0-26.0 weeks). The median total production losses (TL) was 3675 pigs per 1000 sows (IQR, 2356-6845 pigs per 1000 sows); TTS and TTBP were longer and TL higher than a study reported ten years ago (26.6 weeks, 16.5 weeks, and 2217 pigs/1000 sows, respectively). Herd closure strategy, herd interventions such as live virus inoculation and modified-live virus vaccine, and biomanagement strategies to reduce virus transmission among sows and pigs were inconsistent among the studied herds. Implications: Under the conditions of this study, management practices used during PRRS outbreaks were highly diverse among herds. In addition, herd closure, interventions, and biomanagement strategies were inconsistent. The TTS and TTBP were longer, and TL was higher than reported 10 years ago.

Journal of Swine Health and ProductionVol. 32(5)
Iowa Pork Producers Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Animal Virus Infections Studies
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.