Hedging renewable power purchase agreements
This paper uses closed-form and copula models to analyze short-term and medium-term financial instruments' hedging effectiveness and tail risk reduction in long-term renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Using monthly and yearly exchange-traded electricity futures, we study PPA contracts from California, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. The overall low or negative hedging effectiveness and inconsistent tail risk reductions indicate that traditional linear hedging strategies may not consistently achieve the desired risk mitigation. Monthly contracts are generally more effective in California, Germany, and France, while yearly contracts are preferable in Italy and Spain, highlighting the need for market-specific hedging strategies. • Analyzes hedging effectiveness and tail risk in long-term renewable PPAs. • Studies PPA contracts from California, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. • Finds overall low/negative hedging effectiveness and inconsistent tail risk reductions. • Monthly contracts better in CA, Germany, France; yearly preferred in Italy and Spain.
Authors
- Juan Ignacio Peña (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-3583)
- Rosa Rodríguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-2332)
- Silvia Mayoral (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6735-2604)
Institutions
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Energy Strategy Reviews
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101513
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.39
Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades