Confidential Computing Proofs

Proofs are powerful tools for integrity and privacy, enabling the verifier to delegate a computation and still verify its correct execution, and enabling the prover to keep the details of the computation private. Both CCP and ZKP can achieve soundness and zero-knowledge but with important differences. CCP relies on hardware trust assumptions, which yield high performance and additional confidentiality protection for the prover but may be unacceptable for some applications. CCP is also often easier to use, notably with existing code, whereas ZKP comes with a large prover overhead that may be unpractical for some applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Queue
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3689949
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confidential Computing Proofs

Greg Zaverucha, Mark Russinovich, Brandon Murdoch, Cédric Fournet et al.
3 citations
Queue
Cryptography and Data Security
1.04
article

Confidential Computing Proofs

Greg Zaverucha, Mark Russinovich, Brandon Murdoch, Cédric Fournet, Manuel Costa, Josh Benaloh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Proofs are powerful tools for integrity and privacy, enabling the verifier to delegate a computation and still verify its correct execution, and enabling the prover to keep the details of the computation private. Both CCP and ZKP can achieve soundness and zero-knowledge but with important differences. CCP relies on hardware trust assumptions, which yield high performance and additional confidentiality protection for the prover but may be unacceptable for some applications. CCP is also often easier to use, notably with existing code, whereas ZKP comes with a large prover overhead that may be unpractical for some applications.

QueueVol. 22(4)
Microsoft (United States) (US), Microsoft (United Kingdom) (GB), Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cryptography and Data Security
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Confidential Computing Proofs — Greg Zaverucha, Mark Russinovich, et al. · Queue (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS