High-Level Human Intention Learning for Cooperative Decision-Making

Autonomous agents are increasingly popular in various practical domains, assisting humans in performing complex tasks. However, coordinating between agents and humans can be challenging, particularly when communication is limited or non-existent. This paper proposes a method for cooperative decision-making by enabling autonomous agents to infer high-level human intention through their behavioral data. Human is modeled as a sub-optimal reinforcement learning agent. A statistical learning method is developed for implicit probabilistic reasoning of human intentions by accounting for complex and unpredictable human behavior. The proposed method computes the exact likelihood and posterior of human intentions. The method is fully recursive and accounts for human priorities, making it applicable to various domains. The agents’ decision-making is achieved using a combination of the active learning approach and quantified human intentions, which enables effective coordination of tasks and prevents duplication of efforts. The proposed method allows agents to adapt their strategy in real time based on partial knowledge of human intentions. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method in intention inference and task coordination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ccta60707.2024.10666622
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Level Human Intention Learning for Cooperative Decision-Making

Mahdi Imani, Seyede Fatemeh Ghoreishi, Tian Lan, Yuxin Lin
10 citations
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
3.47
article

High-Level Human Intention Learning for Cooperative Decision-Making

Mahdi Imani, Seyede Fatemeh Ghoreishi, Tian Lan, Yuxin Lin
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Autonomous agents are increasingly popular in various practical domains, assisting humans in performing complex tasks. However, coordinating between agents and humans can be challenging, particularly when communication is limited or non-existent. This paper proposes a method for cooperative decision-making by enabling autonomous agents to infer high-level human intention through their behavioral data. Human is modeled as a sub-optimal reinforcement learning agent. A statistical learning method is developed for implicit probabilistic reasoning of human intentions by accounting for complex and unpredictable human behavior. The proposed method computes the exact likelihood and posterior of human intentions. The method is fully recursive and accounts for human priorities, making it applicable to various domains. The agents’ decision-making is achieved using a combination of the active learning approach and quantified human intentions, which enables effective coordination of tasks and prevents duplication of efforts. The proposed method allows agents to adapt their strategy in real time based on partial knowledge of human intentions. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method in intention inference and task coordination.

Northeastern University (US), George Washington University (US)
National Science Foundation, Office of Naval Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
3.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

High-Level Human Intention Learning for Cooperative Decision-Making — Mahdi Imani, Seyede Fatemeh Ghoreishi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS