Improving effort-aware just-in-time defect prediction with weighted code churn and multi-objective slime mold algorithm

Effort-aware just-in-time software defect prediction (JIT-SDP) aims to effectively utilize the limited resources of software quality assurance (SQA) to detect more software defects. This improves the efficiency of SQA work and the quality of the software. However, there is disagreement regarding the representation of the key feature variable, SQA effort, in the field of effort-aware JIT-SDP. Additionally, the most recent metaheuristic optimization algorithms (MOAs) have not yet been effectively integrated with multi-objective effort-aware JIT-SDP tasks. These deficiencies, in both feature representation and model optimization (MO), result in a significant disparity between the performance of effort-aware JIT-SDP techniques and the expectations of the industry. In this study, we present a novel method called weighted code churn (CC) and improved multi-objective slime mold algorithm (SMA) (WCMS) for effort-aware JIT-SDP. It comprises two stages: feature improvement (FI) and MO. In the FI phase, we normalize the two feature variables: number of modified files (NF) and distribution of modified code across each file (Entropy). We then use an exponential function to quantify the level of difficulty of the change. The equation is as follows: DD = NF^Entropy, where DD is an acronym for the degree of difficulty, NF denotes the base number, and Entropy denotes the index. We define change effort as the product of the difficulty degree in implementing the change and CC, with weighted CC representing the change effort. During the MO stage, we improve the SMA by incorporating multi-objective handling capabilities and devising mechanisms for multi-objective synchronization and conflict resolution. We develop a multi-objective optimization algorithm for hyperparameter optimization (HPO) of the JIT-SDP model in WCMS. To evaluate the performance of our method, we conducted experiments using six well-known open-source projects and employed two effort-aware performance evaluation metrics. We evaluated our method based on three scenarios: cross-validation, time-wise cross-validation, and across-project prediction. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method outperforms the benchmark method. Furthermore, the proposed method demonstrates greater scalability and generalization capabilities.