Evaluating Hydrofoil Resistance Components from RANS and Lifting-Line Fluid Simulations

Hydrofoils have become a popular design addition to different kinds of vessels, particularly yachts and race boats. Predicting hydrodynamic forces acting on hydrofoils remains challenging, due to a wide operating regime and complex hydrodynamical phenomena. In this paper we investigate methods of decomposing the total drag force of a hydrofoil from high-fidelity Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) and low-fidelity lifting line computational fluid dynamics simulations into its physical components. Namely, these are the wave-pattern, induced, and viscous drag components. These components were calculated using wake surveys in RANS, while a separation of downwash coefficients was used in the lifting line formulation. Reynolds numbers between 2.57x10^5 and 2.06x10^6 were simulated, which corresponded to chord-based Froude numbers between 0.5 and 4. We present various Froude number-dependent trends in these components which we observed from RANS. Lifting-line models were modified to account for free surface effects using a mirror image of the hydrofoil and benchmarked against RANS results to gauge their accuracy. Reasonable agreement was seen on the total drag coefficient, however there were discrepancies between drag components due to differences in solver fidelity. Two different versions of the free surface boundary condition were simulated—the wall condition and the biplane condition. Simulations with the biplane condition yielded consistently higher drag predictions than with the wall condition, and better matched the total drag from RANS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SNAME Maritime Convention
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5957/smc-2024-033
Primary Topic
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Hydrofoil Resistance Components from RANS and Lifting-Line Fluid Simulations

Natalia Kabaliuk, Lev Chernyshev, Simon Corkery, Mark Jermy et al.
SNAME Maritime Convention
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
article

Evaluating Hydrofoil Resistance Components from RANS and Lifting-Line Fluid Simulations

Natalia Kabaliuk, Lev Chernyshev, Simon Corkery, Mark Jermy, Dan Bernasconi
article en

Abstract

Hydrofoils have become a popular design addition to different kinds of vessels, particularly yachts and race boats. Predicting hydrodynamic forces acting on hydrofoils remains challenging, due to a wide operating regime and complex hydrodynamical phenomena. In this paper we investigate methods of decomposing the total drag force of a hydrofoil from high-fidelity Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) and low-fidelity lifting line computational fluid dynamics simulations into its physical components. Namely, these are the wave-pattern, induced, and viscous drag components. These components were calculated using wake surveys in RANS, while a separation of downwash coefficients was used in the lifting line formulation. Reynolds numbers between 2.57x10^5 and 2.06x10^6 were simulated, which corresponded to chord-based Froude numbers between 0.5 and 4. We present various Froude number-dependent trends in these components which we observed from RANS. Lifting-line models were modified to account for free surface effects using a mirror image of the hydrofoil and benchmarked against RANS results to gauge their accuracy. Reasonable agreement was seen on the total drag coefficient, however there were discrepancies between drag components due to differences in solver fidelity. Two different versions of the free surface boundary condition were simulated—the wall condition and the biplane condition. Simulations with the biplane condition yielded consistently higher drag predictions than with the wall condition, and better matched the total drag from RANS.

SNAME Maritime Convention
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.