No Free Lunch? Welfare Analysis of Firms Selling Through Expert Intermediaries

Abstract We study how firms target and influence expert intermediaries. In our context, pharmaceutical manufacturers provide payments to physicians during promotional interactions. We develop an identification strategy based on plausibly exogenous variation in payments driven by differential exposure to spillovers from AMC CoI policies. Using a case study of an important class of cardiovascular drugs, we estimate heterogeneous effects of payments on prescribing, with firms targeting highly responsive physicians. We also develop a model of supply and demand, which allows us to quantify how oligopoly prices reduce drug prescribing, and how payments move prescribing closer to the optimal level, but at great financial cost. In our estimated model, whether consumers are harmed by payments depends on whether there is substantial under-prescribing due to behavioural or other frictions. In a final exercise, we calibrate such frictions using clinical data and estimate that payments benefit consumers in this case study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae090
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Free Lunch? Welfare Analysis of Firms Selling Through Expert Intermediaries

Aaron Chatterji, Kyle Myers, Matthew Grennan, Ashley Swanson
19 citations
The Review of Economic Studies
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.21
article

No Free Lunch? Welfare Analysis of Firms Selling Through Expert Intermediaries

Aaron Chatterji, Kyle Myers, Matthew Grennan, Ashley Swanson
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study how firms target and influence expert intermediaries. In our context, pharmaceutical manufacturers provide payments to physicians during promotional interactions. We develop an identification strategy based on plausibly exogenous variation in payments driven by differential exposure to spillovers from AMC CoI policies. Using a case study of an important class of cardiovascular drugs, we estimate heterogeneous effects of payments on prescribing, with firms targeting highly responsive physicians. We also develop a model of supply and demand, which allows us to quantify how oligopoly prices reduce drug prescribing, and how payments move prescribing closer to the optimal level, but at great financial cost. In our estimated model, whether consumers are harmed by payments depends on whether there is substantial under-prescribing due to behavioural or other frictions. In a final exercise, we calibrate such frictions using clinical data and estimate that payments benefit consumers in this case study.

The Review of Economic StudiesVol. 92(4)
Berkeley College (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Duke University (US), Fulda University of Applied Sciences (DE), Madison Group (United States) (US), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.