Effect of environmental temperature and semi‐crystalline order on the toughening of polyamide 1010 by <scp>2D</scp> nanomaterials

Abstract By incorporating nanomaterials into polymer matrices, nanocomposites can be produced with enhanced properties, combining the ease of processing thermoplastics with the superior physical characteristics of nanoparticles. In this study, fully bio‐based polyamide 1010 was used as the polymer matrix, with graphene oxide (GO), hexagonal‐boron nitride (h‐BN), and molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ), both individually and in hybrids, serving as fillers. The tensile behavior of these nanocomposites was evaluated at room temperature and −40 °C, along with their morphology and microstructure. Results showed that the nanomaterials slightly shifted the polymer's crystallization temperature upward, indicating a small nucleating effect, but also hindered the development of crystalline domains, reducing the crystallization kinetics. Despite no change in the final crystalline form, nanocomposites with h‐BN and MoS 2 showed lower microstructural order as evidenced by XRD. Regarding tensile behavior, GO provided the greatest toughening at room temperature due to its larger lateral dimensions and good chemical affinity with the matrix. However, at low temperatures, h‐BN‐based nanocomposites maintained the toughening effect better than GO‐based ones. This can be attributed to the lower order of the polymer's semi‐crystalline structure promoted by h‐BN, allowing greater energy dissipation. Surprisingly, hybrid fillers did not exhibit synergistic effects, with one nanomaterial hampering the effect of the other. However, SEM analysis indicated that the fracture mechanisms of the nanocomposites remained unchanged from the neat polymer, which makes them interesting options for applications that require desirable mechanical properties at a wide temperature range. Highlights GO showed the best toughening of polyamide 1010 at room temperature. Toughening at room temperature is mainly due to nanomaterials physical traits. Most nanofillers lowered polyamide's overall microstructural order. Toughening at −40 °C is mainly due to lower microstructural order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29019
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of environmental temperature and semi‐crystalline order on the toughening of polyamide 1010 by 2D nanomaterials

Éric David, Nicole R. Demarquette, Hélio Ribeiro, Guilhermino J. M. Fechine et al.
2 citations
Polymer Composites
Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
0.23
article

Effect of environmental temperature and semi‐crystalline order on the toughening of polyamide 1010 by 2D nanomaterials

Éric David, Nicole R. Demarquette, Hélio Ribeiro, Guilhermino J. M. Fechine, Emna Helal, Gabriel Matheus Pinto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract By incorporating nanomaterials into polymer matrices, nanocomposites can be produced with enhanced properties, combining the ease of processing thermoplastics with the superior physical characteristics of nanoparticles. In this study, fully bio‐based polyamide 1010 was used as the polymer matrix, with graphene oxide (GO), hexagonal‐boron nitride (h‐BN), and molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ), both individually and in hybrids, serving as fillers. The tensile behavior of these nanocomposites was evaluated at room temperature and −40 °C, along with their morphology and microstructure. Results showed that the nanomaterials slightly shifted the polymer's crystallization temperature upward, indicating a small nucleating effect, but also hindered the development of crystalline domains, reducing the crystallization kinetics. Despite no change in the final crystalline form, nanocomposites with h‐BN and MoS 2 showed lower microstructural order as evidenced by XRD. Regarding tensile behavior, GO provided the greatest toughening at room temperature due to its larger lateral dimensions and good chemical affinity with the matrix. However, at low temperatures, h‐BN‐based nanocomposites maintained the toughening effect better than GO‐based ones. This can be attributed to the lower order of the polymer's semi‐crystalline structure promoted by h‐BN, allowing greater energy dissipation. Surprisingly, hybrid fillers did not exhibit synergistic effects, with one nanomaterial hampering the effect of the other. However, SEM analysis indicated that the fracture mechanisms of the nanocomposites remained unchanged from the neat polymer, which makes them interesting options for applications that require desirable mechanical properties at a wide temperature range. Highlights GO showed the best toughening of polyamide 1010 at room temperature. Toughening at room temperature is mainly due to nanomaterials physical traits. Most nanofillers lowered polyamide's overall microstructural order. Toughening at −40 °C is mainly due to lower microstructural order.

Polymer CompositesVol. 46(1)
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR), École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
0.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.