The Effectiveness of Intimate Partner Violence Interventions by the Police, Prosecutors, and Courts

The criminal justice system (CJS), comprising police, prosecutors, and courts, is pivotal in preventing intimate partner violence (IPV). However, challenges persist in effectively protecting victims, with high post-reporting recidivism rates. This systematic review aims to identify CJS interventions targeting IPV recurrence and to assess their effectiveness. Eleven articles meeting inclusion criteria were categorized into three themes: police (five articles), prosecutor (zero articles), and court (six articles). While overall findings lack conclusive evidence on intervention effectiveness, they suggest potential in reducing IPV recidivism among specific perpetrator sub-groups. The review underscores the need to consider contextual factors when evaluating interventions like arrest for IPV prevention. Challenges in identifying evidence-based practices within the CJS persist, necessitating ongoing evaluation research and investment in evidence-based strategies to inform policy and practice effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241275621
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effectiveness of Intimate Partner Violence Interventions by the Police, Prosecutors, and Courts

Johan Stjernqvist, Susanne Strand
5 citations
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
2.64
article

The Effectiveness of Intimate Partner Violence Interventions by the Police, Prosecutors, and Courts

Johan Stjernqvist, Susanne Strand
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The criminal justice system (CJS), comprising police, prosecutors, and courts, is pivotal in preventing intimate partner violence (IPV). However, challenges persist in effectively protecting victims, with high post-reporting recidivism rates. This systematic review aims to identify CJS interventions targeting IPV recurrence and to assess their effectiveness. Eleven articles meeting inclusion criteria were categorized into three themes: police (five articles), prosecutor (zero articles), and court (six articles). While overall findings lack conclusive evidence on intervention effectiveness, they suggest potential in reducing IPV recidivism among specific perpetrator sub-groups. The review underscores the need to consider contextual factors when evaluating interventions like arrest for IPV prevention. Challenges in identifying evidence-based practices within the CJS persist, necessitating ongoing evaluation research and investment in evidence-based strategies to inform policy and practice effectively.

Criminal Justice and BehaviorVol. 51(12)
Örebro University (SE), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effectiveness of Intimate Partner Violence Interventions by the Police, Prosecutors, and Courts — Johan Stjernqvist, Susanne Strand · Criminal Justice and Behavior (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS