COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR METABOLIC SYNDROME IN OVERWEIGHT/OBESE ADULT PATIENTS

Background. Diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is a cluster of risk factors for noninfectious diseases, continue to be discussed and refined by various professional communities. The aim of the study was determination of the incidence of MetS in overweight/obese adult cardiac hospital patients according to the IDF (2005), AHA/NHLBI (2004)/AHA (2023) diagnostic criteria and criteria agreed by IDF/AHA/NHLBI and other scientific societies (2009). Material and methods. 222 patients (103 men and 119 women) with overweight/obesity aged 18 years and older were examined using clinical, laboratory, and instrumental research methods. Results. Among adult patients (46.4% men, 53.6% women), 85.6% (95% CI 80.4-89.6) were found to have MetS according to the IDF (2005) criteria, 82.4% (95% CI 76.9-86.9) according to the AHA/NHLBI (2004) and AHA (2023) criteria, and 87.4% (95% CI 82.4-91.1) according to the criteria agreed by IDF/AHA/NHLBI and other scientific communities (2009). Metabolic syndrome established on the basis of the IDF criteria (2005) and the criteria agreed by the IDF/AHA/NHLBI and other scientific communities (2009) was more often four-component, while that based on the AHA/NHLBI (2004) and AHA (2023) criteria was three-component. Arterial hypertension occurred in 100% of patients with MetS. Conclusion. The presence of four and five components of MS, in particular arterial hypertension in all MetS patients included in the study, indicates the severity of cardiometabolic disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Grodno State Medical University
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25298/2221-8785-2024-22-4-326-331
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR METABOLIC SYNDROME IN OVERWEIGHT/OBESE ADULT PATIENTS

М. В. Штонда
Journal of the Grodno State Medical University
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR METABOLIC SYNDROME IN OVERWEIGHT/OBESE ADULT PATIENTS

М. В. Штонда
article en

Abstract

Background. Diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is a cluster of risk factors for noninfectious diseases, continue to be discussed and refined by various professional communities. The aim of the study was determination of the incidence of MetS in overweight/obese adult cardiac hospital patients according to the IDF (2005), AHA/NHLBI (2004)/AHA (2023) diagnostic criteria and criteria agreed by IDF/AHA/NHLBI and other scientific societies (2009). Material and methods. 222 patients (103 men and 119 women) with overweight/obesity aged 18 years and older were examined using clinical, laboratory, and instrumental research methods. Results. Among adult patients (46.4% men, 53.6% women), 85.6% (95% CI 80.4-89.6) were found to have MetS according to the IDF (2005) criteria, 82.4% (95% CI 76.9-86.9) according to the AHA/NHLBI (2004) and AHA (2023) criteria, and 87.4% (95% CI 82.4-91.1) according to the criteria agreed by IDF/AHA/NHLBI and other scientific communities (2009). Metabolic syndrome established on the basis of the IDF criteria (2005) and the criteria agreed by the IDF/AHA/NHLBI and other scientific communities (2009) was more often four-component, while that based on the AHA/NHLBI (2004) and AHA (2023) criteria was three-component. Arterial hypertension occurred in 100% of patients with MetS. Conclusion. The presence of four and five components of MS, in particular arterial hypertension in all MetS patients included in the study, indicates the severity of cardiometabolic disorders.

Journal of the Grodno State Medical UniversityVol. 22(4)
Human Growth Foundation (US)
American Heart Association, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.