The effect of politically homogenous neighbourhoods on affective polarization: Evidence from Britain

Abstract Affective polarization is increasingly evident around the world. This has been attributed in part to residential segregation by partisanship. The ‘Big Sort’ has meant that neighbourhoods in the United States, and elsewhere, have become more homogenous in terms of vote. Yet there is little systematic evidence on the relationship between homogenous partisan neighbourhoods and affective polarization. Does living among fellow partisans make people more negative towards the other side? In this Research Note, we use unique data from Britain to show that while people accurately recognize that their local area is more or less politically homogenous, neighbourhood political homogeneity is not correlated with any measure of affective polarization. These findings are robust to the type of political divide (partisanship or Brexit identity), the level of geography, length of residence and controls for ideology and social characteristics. We therefore suggest that while geographical sorting is an important phenomenon, it is unlikely to be a major cause of affective polarization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12720
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
40.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of politically homogenous neighbourhoods on affective polarization: Evidence from Britain

James Tilley, SARA BINZER HOBOLT
18 citations
European Journal of Political Research
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
40.16
article

The effect of politically homogenous neighbourhoods on affective polarization: Evidence from Britain

James Tilley, SARA BINZER HOBOLT
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract Affective polarization is increasingly evident around the world. This has been attributed in part to residential segregation by partisanship. The ‘Big Sort’ has meant that neighbourhoods in the United States, and elsewhere, have become more homogenous in terms of vote. Yet there is little systematic evidence on the relationship between homogenous partisan neighbourhoods and affective polarization. Does living among fellow partisans make people more negative towards the other side? In this Research Note, we use unique data from Britain to show that while people accurately recognize that their local area is more or less politically homogenous, neighbourhood political homogeneity is not correlated with any measure of affective polarization. These findings are robust to the type of political divide (partisanship or Brexit identity), the level of geography, length of residence and controls for ideology and social characteristics. We therefore suggest that while geographical sorting is an important phenomenon, it is unlikely to be a major cause of affective polarization.

European Journal of Political ResearchVol. 64(2)
Government of the United Kingdom (GB), University of Oxford (GB), School of International Relations (IR), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
40.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.