Mitigation of Penalties for Patent Crimes: Theories, Trends andMechanisms

The knowledge economy has made the protection of patent rights an increasingly important issue. This paper analyses the jurisprudential basis, social motivation of mitigation and the specific manifestations of mitigation in the legislation of patent crimes in different countries. It indicates that although some countries have increased the statutory penalty for counterfeiting patent crime, yet inflation and other factors have actually weakened the punitive strength of the fine penalty, reflecting the trend of mitigation of penalties for patent crimes. Nevertheless, this study applies three main research methods: theoretical analysis, comparative analysis, and empirical analysis whereas qualitative data will be textually analyzed. It also considers the influence of the progress of human civilization, the limited nature of penal resources, and the principles of behavioral economics on the mitigation of penalties, and offers recommendations for China’s patent crimes legislation. The key findings of this paper that how to identify the theory and practice of mitigating the penalties of patent crimes, legislative trends and its development mechanisms.

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Journal of Criminology
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.4.333.348.
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigation of Penalties for Patent Crimes: Theories, Trends andMechanisms

Pakistan Journal of Criminology
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Mitigation of Penalties for Patent Crimes: Theories, Trends andMechanisms

article en

Abstract

The knowledge economy has made the protection of patent rights an increasingly important issue. This paper analyses the jurisprudential basis, social motivation of mitigation and the specific manifestations of mitigation in the legislation of patent crimes in different countries. It indicates that although some countries have increased the statutory penalty for counterfeiting patent crime, yet inflation and other factors have actually weakened the punitive strength of the fine penalty, reflecting the trend of mitigation of penalties for patent crimes. Nevertheless, this study applies three main research methods: theoretical analysis, comparative analysis, and empirical analysis whereas qualitative data will be textually analyzed. It also considers the influence of the progress of human civilization, the limited nature of penal resources, and the principles of behavioral economics on the mitigation of penalties, and offers recommendations for China’s patent crimes legislation. The key findings of this paper that how to identify the theory and practice of mitigating the penalties of patent crimes, legislative trends and its development mechanisms.

Pakistan Journal of Criminology(4)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Beijing International Studies University
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.