The relationships between tensile strength, mode I and mode II fracture toughness of rock: An empirical and microcracking perspective

The empirical relationships between tensile strength, mode I and mode II fracture toughness obtained by previous studies have the problem of a small amount of data for fitting, and more data are needed for further study. There is a discrepancy between the theoretical prediction and the experimental results of the relationship between mode II and mode I fracture toughness. Because of this, a review is conducted to determine the relationships among tensile strength, mode I fracture toughness, and mode II fracture toughness from the data gathered from the available literature. The results indicate that the mode I and mode II fracture toughness have linear relationships with tensile strength with the linear coefficient of 0.141 and 0.219, respectively. The linear coefficient between mode II and mode I fracture toughness is 2.389, indicating that the classical mixed mode criteria are mistaken the empirical relationship between mode II and mode I fracture toughness. The microcracking mechanism and failure model are quantified and compared in detail among tensile test, mode I and mode II fracture toughness tests based on moment tensor. It found that the nature of the source can be related to each other, which gives some light on the reason for the existence of certain relationships between these macroscopic parameters from a microcracking perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37438
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationships between tensile strength, mode I and mode II fracture toughness of rock: An empirical and microcracking perspective

Shunchuan Wu, Wei Sun, Jinsheng Zhao, Wenbing Guo et al.
6 citations
Heliyon
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.62
article

The relationships between tensile strength, mode I and mode II fracture toughness of rock: An empirical and microcracking perspective

Shunchuan Wu, Wei Sun, Jinsheng Zhao, Wenbing Guo, Zhiqiang Hou
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The empirical relationships between tensile strength, mode I and mode II fracture toughness obtained by previous studies have the problem of a small amount of data for fitting, and more data are needed for further study. There is a discrepancy between the theoretical prediction and the experimental results of the relationship between mode II and mode I fracture toughness. Because of this, a review is conducted to determine the relationships among tensile strength, mode I fracture toughness, and mode II fracture toughness from the data gathered from the available literature. The results indicate that the mode I and mode II fracture toughness have linear relationships with tensile strength with the linear coefficient of 0.141 and 0.219, respectively. The linear coefficient between mode II and mode I fracture toughness is 2.389, indicating that the classical mixed mode criteria are mistaken the empirical relationship between mode II and mode I fracture toughness. The microcracking mechanism and failure model are quantified and compared in detail among tensile test, mode I and mode II fracture toughness tests based on moment tensor. It found that the nature of the source can be related to each other, which gives some light on the reason for the existence of certain relationships between these macroscopic parameters from a microcracking perspective.

HeliyonVol. 10(18)
State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Henan Polytechnic University, Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.