Relationships between soil test phosphorus and county‐level agricultural surplus phosphorus

National nutrient inventories provide surplus phosphorus (P) estimates derived from county-scale mass balance calculations using P inputs from manure and fertilizer sales and P outputs from crop yield data. Although bioavailable P and surplus P are often correlated at the field scale, few studies have investigated the relationship between measured soil P concentrations of large-scale soil testing programs and inventory-based surplus P estimates. In this study, we assessed the relationship between national surplus P data from the NuGIS dataset and laboratory-measured soil test phosphorus (STP) at the county scale for Arkansas, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. For optimal periods of surplus P aggregation, surplus P was positively correlated with STP based on both Pearson (Arkansas: r = 0.65, North Carolina: r = 0.45, Oklahoma: r = 0.52) and Spearman correlation coefficients (Arkansas: ρ = 0.57, North Carolina: ρ = 0.28, and Oklahoma: ρ = 0.66). Based on Pearson correlations, the optimal surplus P aggregation periods were 10, 30, and 4 years for AR, NC, and OK, respectively. On average, STP was more strongly correlated with surplus P than with individual P inventory components (fertilizer, manure, and crop removal), except in North Carolina. In Arkansas and North Carolina, manure P was positively correlated with STP, and fertilizer P was negatively correlated with STP. Altogether, results suggest that surplus P moderately correlates with STP concentrations, but aggregation period and location-specific factors influence the strength of the relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Quality
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20622
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships between soil test phosphorus and county‐level agricultural surplus phosphorus

Stephanie B. Kulesza, Daniel R. Obenour, Nathan A. Slaton, Owen W. Duckworth et al.
2 citations
Journal of Environmental Quality
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
0.50
article

Relationships between soil test phosphorus and county‐level agricultural surplus phosphorus

Stephanie B. Kulesza, Daniel R. Obenour, Nathan A. Slaton, Owen W. Duckworth, Andrew H. Whitaker, Natalie G. Nelson, Qicheng Tang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

National nutrient inventories provide surplus phosphorus (P) estimates derived from county-scale mass balance calculations using P inputs from manure and fertilizer sales and P outputs from crop yield data. Although bioavailable P and surplus P are often correlated at the field scale, few studies have investigated the relationship between measured soil P concentrations of large-scale soil testing programs and inventory-based surplus P estimates. In this study, we assessed the relationship between national surplus P data from the NuGIS dataset and laboratory-measured soil test phosphorus (STP) at the county scale for Arkansas, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. For optimal periods of surplus P aggregation, surplus P was positively correlated with STP based on both Pearson (Arkansas: r = 0.65, North Carolina: r = 0.45, Oklahoma: r = 0.52) and Spearman correlation coefficients (Arkansas: ρ = 0.57, North Carolina: ρ = 0.28, and Oklahoma: ρ = 0.66). Based on Pearson correlations, the optimal surplus P aggregation periods were 10, 30, and 4 years for AR, NC, and OK, respectively. On average, STP was more strongly correlated with surplus P than with individual P inventory components (fertilizer, manure, and crop removal), except in North Carolina. In Arkansas and North Carolina, manure P was positively correlated with STP, and fertilizer P was negatively correlated with STP. Altogether, results suggest that surplus P moderately correlates with STP concentrations, but aggregation period and location-specific factors influence the strength of the relationship.

Journal of Environmental QualityVol. 53(6)
Oklahoma State University (US), North Carolina State University (US), East Central University (US), University of Arkansas System (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.