Evaluating the effects of wolf culling on livestock predation when considering wolf population dynamics in an individual‐based model

The efficiency of the management of predations on livestock by gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) through culling is under debate. Evaluating wolf culling efficiency requires to simultaneously analyze the effects of culling on the wolf population and the repercussions of these population changes on livestock predation. This protocol is technically difficult to implement in the field. To properly assess culling efficiency, we provided an integrated and flexible individual‐based model that simulated interactions between wolf population dynamics, predation behavior and culling management. We considered many social processes in wolves. We calibrated the model to match the Western Alps as a case study. By considering the prey community in this area and the opportunistic nature of wolf predation, we assumed that predation on livestock at the wolf territory level increased with pack's food needs. Under this assumption and considering livestock availability as high and livestock vulnerability as uniform in space and time, culling maintained wolf population size and predation risks at low levels. Contrary to what was expected, culling decreased the mean annual proportions of dispersing wolves in our simulations, by speeding settlement. This population‐level mechanism compensated for the high mortality and the pack instability caused by culling. Compensation was however dependent on the selectivity and the timing of culling. When executed before the natural mortality module in our model, the selective culling could undermine replacement of lost breeders and therefore decrease wolf population resilience to culling. Our model gives insights about culling effects in one specific simulated context, but we do not expect that our assumption about predation behavior necessarily holds in other ecological contexts and we therefore encourage further explorations of the model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Biology
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01227
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the effects of wolf culling on livestock predation when considering wolf population dynamics in an individual‐based model

Nolwenn Drouet‐Hoguet, Sarah Bauduin, Nina Luisa Santostasi, Oksana Grente et al.
9 citations
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
4.13
article

Evaluating the effects of wolf culling on livestock predation when considering wolf population dynamics in an individual‐based model

Nolwenn Drouet‐Hoguet, Sarah Bauduin, Nina Luisa Santostasi, Oksana Grente, Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes, Christophe Duchamp, Olivier Giménez
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The efficiency of the management of predations on livestock by gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) through culling is under debate. Evaluating wolf culling efficiency requires to simultaneously analyze the effects of culling on the wolf population and the repercussions of these population changes on livestock predation. This protocol is technically difficult to implement in the field. To properly assess culling efficiency, we provided an integrated and flexible individual‐based model that simulated interactions between wolf population dynamics, predation behavior and culling management. We considered many social processes in wolves. We calibrated the model to match the Western Alps as a case study. By considering the prey community in this area and the opportunistic nature of wolf predation, we assumed that predation on livestock at the wolf territory level increased with pack's food needs. Under this assumption and considering livestock availability as high and livestock vulnerability as uniform in space and time, culling maintained wolf population size and predation risks at low levels. Contrary to what was expected, culling decreased the mean annual proportions of dispersing wolves in our simulations, by speeding settlement. This population‐level mechanism compensated for the high mortality and the pack instability caused by culling. Compensation was however dependent on the selectivity and the timing of culling. When executed before the natural mortality module in our model, the selective culling could undermine replacement of lost breeders and therefore decrease wolf population resilience to culling. Our model gives insights about culling effects in one specific simulated context, but we do not expect that our assumption about predation behavior necessarily holds in other ecological contexts and we therefore encourage further explorations of the model.

Wildlife BiologyVol. 2024(6)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Office Français de la Biodiversité, Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Agence française pour la biodiversité
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
4.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.