EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR BREAST CANCER DETECTION: A STUDY ON ACCURACY AND PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE

This study evaluates several machine learning algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree (C4.5), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—for breast cancer detection using the Breast Cancer Wisconsin Diagnostic dataset. We implemented comprehensive pre-processing and model evaluation with Scikit-learn in Python. Our findings show that SVM achieved the highest accuracy, with 99.9% on the training set and 98.50% on the testing set, indicating superior performance in handling high-dimensional data. Random Forest also performed well, with accuracies of 98.5% and 98.20%, respectively. Logistic Regression and Decision Tree models provided reliable predictions when tuned, while KNN was less effective. SVM and Random Forest are recommended for clinical decision support systems due to their high accuracy and robustness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Engineering And Technology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/volume06issue09-04
Citations
9
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR BREAST CANCER DETECTION: A STUDY ON ACCURACY AND PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE

Md Al Rafi, Rowsan Jahan Bhuiyan, Salma Akter, Md Al-Imran et al.
9 citations
The American Journal of Engineering And Technology
AI in cancer detection
3.13
article

EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR BREAST CANCER DETECTION: A STUDY ON ACCURACY AND PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE

Md Al Rafi, Rowsan Jahan Bhuiyan, Salma Akter, Md Al-Imran, Md Amit Hasan, Md Abu Sufian Mozumder, Md Shahriar Mahmud Bhuiyan, Gourab Nicholas Rodrigues, Md. Emran Hossen, Ashim Chandra Das, Md Nazmul Hossain Mir
article en
9 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates several machine learning algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree (C4.5), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—for breast cancer detection using the Breast Cancer Wisconsin Diagnostic dataset. We implemented comprehensive pre-processing and model evaluation with Scikit-learn in Python. Our findings show that SVM achieved the highest accuracy, with 99.9% on the training set and 98.50% on the testing set, indicating superior performance in handling high-dimensional data. Random Forest also performed well, with accuracies of 98.5% and 98.20%, respectively. Logistic Regression and Decision Tree models provided reliable predictions when tuned, while KNN was less effective. SVM and Random Forest are recommended for clinical decision support systems due to their high accuracy and robustness.

The American Journal of Engineering And TechnologyVol. 6(9)
University of Science and Technology (YE), Trine University (US), Gannon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
AI in cancer detection
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR BREAST CANCER DETECTION: A STUDY ON ACCURACY AND PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE — Md Al Rafi, Rowsan Jahan Bhuiyan, et al. · The American Journal of Engineering And Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS