Assembling Hyperpop: Genre Formation on Wikipedia

In this article, we analyze how a music genre is reciprocally defined online, through the crowdsourced ‘facts’ of Wikipedia. What are the traditional implicit and explicit exclusionary practices in this sort of genre formation? And how can internet-specific sociabilities create new exclusionary practices in the process of defining music? By analyzing the edit history of Wikipedia’s ‘hyperpop’ page, we locate ongoing debates, controversies, and contestations that point to shaping forces around online genre formation. These potentially have a huge impact on how hyperpop is understood both inside and outside of the music community. In locating the most active editors of the hyperpop Wikipedia page and scrutinizing their edit histories as well as the discussions on the hyperpop page itself, we uncovered debates about artistic notability, biases toward specific sources, and attempts at associating or dissociating musical genre from non-musical identities (such as race, gender, and nationality). In sum, we aimed to investigate the main controversies involved in the Wikipedia definition of hyperpop for what they can tell us about both the process of online genre formation and the very nature of collective knowledge-making spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cultural Sociology
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755241264905
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assembling Hyperpop: Genre Formation on Wikipedia

Eliot Bates, Rômulo Moraes, Sophie Delphis, Julia Santoli
Cultural Sociology
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Assembling Hyperpop: Genre Formation on Wikipedia

Eliot Bates, Rômulo Moraes, Sophie Delphis, Julia Santoli
article en

Abstract

In this article, we analyze how a music genre is reciprocally defined online, through the crowdsourced ‘facts’ of Wikipedia. What are the traditional implicit and explicit exclusionary practices in this sort of genre formation? And how can internet-specific sociabilities create new exclusionary practices in the process of defining music? By analyzing the edit history of Wikipedia’s ‘hyperpop’ page, we locate ongoing debates, controversies, and contestations that point to shaping forces around online genre formation. These potentially have a huge impact on how hyperpop is understood both inside and outside of the music community. In locating the most active editors of the hyperpop Wikipedia page and scrutinizing their edit histories as well as the discussions on the hyperpop page itself, we uncovered debates about artistic notability, biases toward specific sources, and attempts at associating or dissociating musical genre from non-musical identities (such as race, gender, and nationality). In sum, we aimed to investigate the main controversies involved in the Wikipedia definition of hyperpop for what they can tell us about both the process of online genre formation and the very nature of collective knowledge-making spaces.

Cultural SociologyVol. 20(1)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assembling Hyperpop: Genre Formation on Wikipedia — Eliot Bates, Rômulo Moraes, et al. · Cultural Sociology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS