Money as a “Social Power”: Commodity Fetishism and Financialization

Marx’s concepts of commodity and money fetishism explain the perception that money and commodities have “value,” presumably as part of their intrinsic properties. In fact, the exchange value of commodities and money results from living labor and the extraction of surplus value. With a historic review of the institutions for production, circulation, and credit, this appearance of capitalism can be explained. Further, the view that money is valuable in itself can lead to overexpansion of credit, stagnation, and instability. The attribution of “value” to living labor and the environment instead of money would result in different policies and priorities, and a more stable and equitable economy, rather than “financialization” and crises. JEL Classification: N23, G15, G23, B52

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Radical Political Economics
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134241270682
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Money as a “Social Power”: Commodity Fetishism and Financialization

Ann E. Davis
Review of Radical Political Economics
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Money as a “Social Power”: Commodity Fetishism and Financialization

Ann E. Davis
article en

Abstract

Marx’s concepts of commodity and money fetishism explain the perception that money and commodities have “value,” presumably as part of their intrinsic properties. In fact, the exchange value of commodities and money results from living labor and the extraction of surplus value. With a historic review of the institutions for production, circulation, and credit, this appearance of capitalism can be explained. Further, the view that money is valuable in itself can lead to overexpansion of credit, stagnation, and instability. The attribution of “value” to living labor and the environment instead of money would result in different policies and priorities, and a more stable and equitable economy, rather than “financialization” and crises. JEL Classification: N23, G15, G23, B52

Review of Radical Political EconomicsVol. 56(4)
Marist University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.