Platelet Pathogen Reduction Technology—Should We Stay or Should We Go…?

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has significantly challenged blood transfusion services (BTS) for providing blood products and for keeping blood supplies available. The possibility that a similar pandemic event may occur again has induced researchers and transfusionists to investigate the adoption of new tools to prevent and reduce these risks. Similarly, increased donor travelling and globalization, with consequent donor deferral and donor pool reduction, have contributed to raising awareness on this topic. Although recent studies have validated the use of pathogen reduction technology (PRT) for the control of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) this method is not a standard of care despite increasing adoption. We present a critical commentary on the role of PRT for platelets and on associated problems for blood transfusion services (BTS). The balance of the cost effectiveness of adopting PRT is also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185359
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platelet Pathogen Reduction Technology—Should We Stay or Should We Go…?

Andrea Piccin, Katrina M. Lappin, Gilbert Spizzo, Allameddine Allameddine et al.
6 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Blood donation and transfusion practices
4.39
article

Platelet Pathogen Reduction Technology—Should We Stay or Should We Go…?

Andrea Piccin, Katrina M. Lappin, Gilbert Spizzo, Allameddine Allameddine, Daniele Prati
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has significantly challenged blood transfusion services (BTS) for providing blood products and for keeping blood supplies available. The possibility that a similar pandemic event may occur again has induced researchers and transfusionists to investigate the adoption of new tools to prevent and reduce these risks. Similarly, increased donor travelling and globalization, with consequent donor deferral and donor pool reduction, have contributed to raising awareness on this topic. Although recent studies have validated the use of pathogen reduction technology (PRT) for the control of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) this method is not a standard of care despite increasing adoption. We present a critical commentary on the role of PRT for platelets and on associated problems for blood transfusion services (BTS). The balance of the cost effectiveness of adopting PRT is also discussed.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(18)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Trento (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT), Krankenhaus Brixen (IT), Irish Blood Transfusion Service (IE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
4.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.