The routes to intellectual authority in a prior colonial empire: continued racialised, geopolitical inequalities in the academic staff composition and employment conditions of UK universities
Two problematics are exposed and explored within this paper which currently undermine the United Kingdom’s international commitments to address racial inequality and injustice: (1) the routes to national, regional, and international intellectual authority via the academic profession, particularly the assigned leadership position of full professor or ‘chair’; and (2) the effects of dysconscious data literacy, which is out of step with international mechanisms and agendas to combat racism and xenophobia. This is undertaken through a critical quantitative analysis of administrative data about the socio-demographic composition and employment conditions of academic staff in the devolved nations of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Iniquitous employment conditions revealed how the social determinants of ‘race’, ‘sex’, ‘nationality’, and ‘religious belief impact academics’ access to employment and participation once employed; particularly in the discipline of Education. Shortcomings in categorisation and reporting of official data serve to obfuscate transparency and accountability about inequality.<br/><br/>
Authors
- Jason Arday (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-1068)
- Dina Zoë Belluigi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-0160)
- Joanne O’Keeffe
Institutions
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Bridge University (SS)
- Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Race Ethnicity and Education
- Published
- 2024-09-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2024.2398491
- Primary Topic
- Higher Education Governance and Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- British Educational Research Association