Reproducibility and Repeatability of US Shear-Wave and Transient Elastography in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background US shear-wave elastography (SWE) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) enable assessment of liver stiffness, an indicator of fibrosis severity. However, limited reproducibility data restrict their use in clinical trials. Purpose To estimate SWE and VCTE measurement variability in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) within and across systems to support clinical trial diagnostic enrichment and clinical interpretation of longitudinal liver stiffness. Materials and Methods This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study (March 2021 to November 2021) enrolled adults with NAFLD, stratified according to the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index (≤1.3, >1.3 and <2.67, ≥2.67), at two sites to assess SWE with five US systems and VCTE with one system. Each participant underwent 12 elastography examinations over two separate days within 1 week, with each day's examinations conducted by a different operator. VCTE and SWE measurements were reported in units of meters per second. The primary end point was the different-day, different-operator reproducibility coefficient (RDC<sub>DDDO</sub>) pooled across systems for SWE and individually for VCTE. Secondary end points included system-specific RDC<sub>DDDO</sub>, same-day, same-operator repeatability coefficient (RC<sub>SDSO</sub>), and between-system same-day, same-operator reproducibility coefficient. The planned sample provided 80% power to detect a pooled RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> of less than 35%, the prespecified performance threshold. Results A total of 40 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [SD]; 24 women) with low (<i>n</i> = 17), intermediate (<i>n</i> = 15), and high (<i>n</i> = 8) FIB-4 scores were enrolled. RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> was 30.7% (95% upper bound, 34.4%) for SWE and 35.6% (95% upper bound, 43.9%) for VCTE. SWE system-specific RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> varied from 24.2% to 34.3%. The RC<sub>SDSO</sub> was 21.0% for SWE (range, 13.9%-35.0%) and 19.6% for VCTE. The SWE between-system same-day, same-operator reproducibility coefficient was 52.7%. Conclusion SWE met the prespecified threshold, RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> less than 35%, with VCTE having a higher RDC<sub>DDDO</sub>. SWE variability was higher between different systems. These estimates advance liver US-based noninvasive test qualification by <i>(a)</i> defining expected variability, <i>(b)</i> establishing that serial examination variability is lower when performed with the same system, and <i>(c)</i> informing clinical trial design. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04828551 © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233094
Citations
31
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproducibility and Repeatability of US Shear-Wave and Transient Elastography in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

X J Wang, Theodore T. Pierce, H.O. Heymann, David Hunt et al.
31 citations
Radiology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
11.99
article

Reproducibility and Repeatability of US Shear-Wave and Transient Elastography in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

X J Wang, Theodore T. Pierce, H.O. Heymann, David Hunt, Sarah P. Sherlock, Kathleen E. Corey, Claude B. Sirlin, Guilherme Moura Cunha, Roberto A. Calle, Kathryn J. Fowler, Tania N. Kamphaus, Rohit Seth Loomba, Yesenia Covarrubias, Michael S. Middleton, Marian Martin, Arun Jayant Sanyal, Hannah Edenbaum, Anthony E. Samir, Arinc Ozturk, Nancy A. Obuchowski, Qian Li, Sudha S. Shankar
article en
31 citations

Abstract

Background US shear-wave elastography (SWE) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) enable assessment of liver stiffness, an indicator of fibrosis severity. However, limited reproducibility data restrict their use in clinical trials. Purpose To estimate SWE and VCTE measurement variability in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) within and across systems to support clinical trial diagnostic enrichment and clinical interpretation of longitudinal liver stiffness. Materials and Methods This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study (March 2021 to November 2021) enrolled adults with NAFLD, stratified according to the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index (≤1.3, >1.3 and <2.67, ≥2.67), at two sites to assess SWE with five US systems and VCTE with one system. Each participant underwent 12 elastography examinations over two separate days within 1 week, with each day's examinations conducted by a different operator. VCTE and SWE measurements were reported in units of meters per second. The primary end point was the different-day, different-operator reproducibility coefficient (RDC<sub>DDDO</sub>) pooled across systems for SWE and individually for VCTE. Secondary end points included system-specific RDC<sub>DDDO</sub>, same-day, same-operator repeatability coefficient (RC<sub>SDSO</sub>), and between-system same-day, same-operator reproducibility coefficient. The planned sample provided 80% power to detect a pooled RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> of less than 35%, the prespecified performance threshold. Results A total of 40 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [SD]; 24 women) with low (<i>n</i> = 17), intermediate (<i>n</i> = 15), and high (<i>n</i> = 8) FIB-4 scores were enrolled. RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> was 30.7% (95% upper bound, 34.4%) for SWE and 35.6% (95% upper bound, 43.9%) for VCTE. SWE system-specific RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> varied from 24.2% to 34.3%. The RC<sub>SDSO</sub> was 21.0% for SWE (range, 13.9%-35.0%) and 19.6% for VCTE. The SWE between-system same-day, same-operator reproducibility coefficient was 52.7%. Conclusion SWE met the prespecified threshold, RDC<sub>DDDO</sub> less than 35%, with VCTE having a higher RDC<sub>DDDO</sub>. SWE variability was higher between different systems. These estimates advance liver US-based noninvasive test qualification by <i>(a)</i> defining expected variability, <i>(b)</i> establishing that serial examination variability is lower when performed with the same system, and <i>(c)</i> informing clinical trial design. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04828551 © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

RadiologyVol. 312(3)
Center for Systems Biology (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Radiological Society of North America, University of Cincinnati, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Center for Research Resources
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
11.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.