Waveform systematics in gravitational-wave inference of signals from binary neutron star merger models incorporating higher-order modes information

Accurate information from gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary neutron stars (BNSs) provides essential input to downstream interpretations, including inference of the neutron star population and equation of state. However, even adopting the currently most accurate and physically motivated models available for parameter estimation of BNSs, these models remain subject to waveform modeling uncertainty: differences between these models may introduce biases in recovered source properties. In this work, we describe injection studies investigating these systematic differences between the two best waveform models available for BNSs currently, NRHybSur3dq8Tidal and TEOBResumS. We demonstrate that, for BNS sources observable by current second-generation detectors, differences for low-amplitude signals are significant for certain sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.064024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waveform systematics in gravitational-wave inference of signals from binary neutron star merger models incorporating higher-order modes information

J. Lange, A. B. Yelikar, A. Z. Jan, R. O’Shaughnessy
1 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
0.33
article

Waveform systematics in gravitational-wave inference of signals from binary neutron star merger models incorporating higher-order modes information

J. Lange, A. B. Yelikar, A. Z. Jan, R. O’Shaughnessy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate information from gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary neutron stars (BNSs) provides essential input to downstream interpretations, including inference of the neutron star population and equation of state. However, even adopting the currently most accurate and physically motivated models available for parameter estimation of BNSs, these models remain subject to waveform modeling uncertainty: differences between these models may introduce biases in recovered source properties. In this work, we describe injection studies investigating these systematic differences between the two best waveform models available for BNSs currently, NRHybSur3dq8Tidal and TEOBResumS. We demonstrate that, for BNS sources observable by current second-generation detectors, differences for low-amplitude signals are significant for certain sources.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(6)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, Simons Foundation, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.