Identifying predictors of malingering in psychiatric emergency room settings and evaluating intervention strategies to reduce unnecessary er utilization. Literature review
Malingering in psychiatric emergency room (ER) settings presents a significant challenge, leading to unnecessary healthcare resource utilization and potentially compromising patient care. This literature review examines predictors of malingering and evaluates intervention strategies aimed at reducing unnecessary ER visits. The review identifies a range of predictors, including demographic factors, clinical presentations, historical elements, and motivational aspects, that may indicate malingering. Tools such as structured interviews, validity scales, and behavioral observations are highlighted for their effectiveness in identifying malingering behaviors in psychiatric ERs. The review also explores various intervention strategies, including early identification protocols, staff training programs, and collaborative care models, which have shown promise in mitigating the impact of malingering on healthcare systems. These strategies are important in ensuring that resources are appropriately allocated while maintaining high standards of patient care. However, ethical considerations, particularly the balance between detecting malingering and providing genuine patient care, remain critical challenges. Addressing these issues is essential for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of emergency psychiatric care and ensuring that patients receive appropriate and timely care.
Authors
- Chinelo Chioma Madekwe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-0615)
- Ibrahim Lanre Folorunsho
- Nkechinyere Mary Harry
- Inelefo R Iyayi
- Derek Olatunde Olagbemi
- Victoria Chioma Ekechi
- Oluwatayo A Dare
- Nkiru Ego Uzowulu
- Etinosa Idemudia
Publication Details
- Journal
- World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
- Published
- 2024-09-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.19.3.0589
- Primary Topic
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00