CSR Communication and the Polarization of Public Discourses: Introduction to the Special Issue

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication faces significant challenges due to an increasing polarization of public discourses. This polarization oversimplifies societal differences into “us versus them” dynamics, complicating consensus building and eroding trust in democratic processes. Traditionally, CSR communication research has focused on how organizations negotiate meanings between various stakeholders. However, the rise in polarization necessitates a broader research scope to understand its impact on CSR practices and organizational relationships. This Special Issue of Management Communication Quarterly explores these evolving challenges, analyzing how polarization reshapes CSR communication and outlining strategies for businesses to navigate this fragmented landscape. The issue also reflects on the broader role of corporations amidst tendencies of polarization and suggests directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189241268503
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CSR Communication and the Polarization of Public Discourses: Introduction to the Special Issue

Dennis Schoeneborn, Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich, Amy O’Connor, Urša Golob et al.
6 citations
Management Communication Quarterly
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
3.33
article

CSR Communication and the Polarization of Public Discourses: Introduction to the Special Issue

Dennis Schoeneborn, Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich, Amy O’Connor, Urša Golob, Matthias Wenzel
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication faces significant challenges due to an increasing polarization of public discourses. This polarization oversimplifies societal differences into “us versus them” dynamics, complicating consensus building and eroding trust in democratic processes. Traditionally, CSR communication research has focused on how organizations negotiate meanings between various stakeholders. However, the rise in polarization necessitates a broader research scope to understand its impact on CSR practices and organizational relationships. This Special Issue of Management Communication Quarterly explores these evolving challenges, analyzing how polarization reshapes CSR communication and outlining strategies for businesses to navigate this fragmented landscape. The issue also reflects on the broader role of corporations amidst tendencies of polarization and suggests directions for future research.

Management Communication QuarterlyVol. 38(4)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), University of Minnesota (US), University of Ljubljana (SI), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.