Privacy Preserving Evaluation of Sensitive Population Record Linkage in the Absence of Ground Truth Data

ObjectivesLinkage of data containing personal information allows extensive studies in the health and social sciences for population level studies. However, real-world linkage applications often lack ground truth (GT) data, generally due to privacy concerns, which hinders linkage quality assessment. We propose a method to assess the linkage of sensitive population data in the absence of GT data. ApproachOur method takes as input a set of sensitive and public population clusters. The sensitive clusters are generated with some record linkage algorithm, whereas the public population dataset, which is considered an approximation for the GT, is assumed to have a group identifier allowing generation of known clusters, such as households or families. We encode clusters as bit vectors and conduct cluster matching across the sensitive and public datasets using vector comparisons. Based on matched clusters, the population linkage quality of sensitive data is estimated. ResultsWe conducted experiments on a sensitive Scottish birth data set containing 17,613 records from 1861 to 1901, and four successive publicly available Scottish census datasets from 1871 to 1901. Using the quality measures precision, recall and the F-measure, we show that our estimations are close to GT quality, with a high correlation in F-measure values ranging from 88% to 99%. ConclusionWe proposed a method to estimate the linkage quality of sensitive population data for situations where public data with similar characteristics are available for approximating the GT. Our experimental evaluation showed that our method was effective in estimating true linkage quality with high accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2530
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privacy Preserving Evaluation of Sensitive Population Record Linkage in the Absence of Ground Truth Data

Peter Christen, Eilidh Garrett, Charini Nanayakkara, Jie Song
International Journal for Population Data Science
Data Quality and Management
article

Privacy Preserving Evaluation of Sensitive Population Record Linkage in the Absence of Ground Truth Data

Peter Christen, Eilidh Garrett, Charini Nanayakkara, Jie Song
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesLinkage of data containing personal information allows extensive studies in the health and social sciences for population level studies. However, real-world linkage applications often lack ground truth (GT) data, generally due to privacy concerns, which hinders linkage quality assessment. We propose a method to assess the linkage of sensitive population data in the absence of GT data. ApproachOur method takes as input a set of sensitive and public population clusters. The sensitive clusters are generated with some record linkage algorithm, whereas the public population dataset, which is considered an approximation for the GT, is assumed to have a group identifier allowing generation of known clusters, such as households or families. We encode clusters as bit vectors and conduct cluster matching across the sensitive and public datasets using vector comparisons. Based on matched clusters, the population linkage quality of sensitive data is estimated. ResultsWe conducted experiments on a sensitive Scottish birth data set containing 17,613 records from 1861 to 1901, and four successive publicly available Scottish census datasets from 1871 to 1901. Using the quality measures precision, recall and the F-measure, we show that our estimations are close to GT quality, with a high correlation in F-measure values ranging from 88% to 99%. ConclusionWe proposed a method to estimate the linkage quality of sensitive population data for situations where public data with similar characteristics are available for approximating the GT. Our experimental evaluation showed that our method was effective in estimating true linkage quality with high accuracy.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 9(5)
Australian National University (AU), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.