Real or faux leather? Luxury or ready-to-wear mass production? Characterization of three TPU shoe coatings (ca. 1970) from the Kunstmuseum Den Haag fashion collection

During the 1970s, the shoe industry’s transition from real to faux leather raises questions about transparency regarding the materials used and the real cost of the production. Were luxury brands conscious of the quality of the products that they offered consumers, compared to other ready-to-wear market brands? Or, on the other hand, were they simply following trends in the fashion industry made possible by the introduction of leather substitutes? By studying three different shoes from the Kunstmuseum Den Haag’s fashion collection, a comparison can be drawn between the products used by well-known luxury fashion brands such as Charles Jourdan or Gucci, and those used by lesser-known brands for mass production such as Valentina. The results obtained by analytical techniques (OM, SEM-EDX, ATR-FTIR) reveal similarities between the both luxury brands and the mass-production brand as well as similar degradation elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservar Património
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14568/cp34780
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real or faux leather? Luxury or ready-to-wear mass production? Characterization of three TPU shoe coatings (ca. 1970) from the Kunstmuseum Den Haag fashion collection

César Rodríguez Salinas, Livio Ferrazza
Conservar Património
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Real or faux leather? Luxury or ready-to-wear mass production? Characterization of three TPU shoe coatings (ca. 1970) from the Kunstmuseum Den Haag fashion collection

César Rodríguez Salinas, Livio Ferrazza
article en

Abstract

During the 1970s, the shoe industry’s transition from real to faux leather raises questions about transparency regarding the materials used and the real cost of the production. Were luxury brands conscious of the quality of the products that they offered consumers, compared to other ready-to-wear market brands? Or, on the other hand, were they simply following trends in the fashion industry made possible by the introduction of leather substitutes? By studying three different shoes from the Kunstmuseum Den Haag’s fashion collection, a comparison can be drawn between the products used by well-known luxury fashion brands such as Charles Jourdan or Gucci, and those used by lesser-known brands for mass production such as Valentina. The results obtained by analytical techniques (OM, SEM-EDX, ATR-FTIR) reveal similarities between the both luxury brands and the mass-production brand as well as similar degradation elements.

Conservar Património
Instituto Valenciano de Competitividad Empresarial (ES), Gemeente Den Haag (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real or faux leather? Luxury or ready-to-wear mass production? Characterization of three TPU shoe coatings (ca. 1970) from the Kunstmuseum Den Haag fashion collection — César Rodríguez Salinas, Livio Ferrazza · Conservar Património (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS