Using NHS Data to Monitor Trends in the Occurrence of Severe, Food-Induced Allergic Reactions Work Package 1

People with food allergies may experience food allergic reactions due to accidental exposure. These reactions are commonly categorised as non-severe, fatal food anaphylaxis and near-fatal food anaphylaxis. Non-severe allergic reactions to food are more common with an incidence of up to 1,000 times greater than fatal food-related anaphylaxis. However, obtaining accurate data relating to the circumstances under which these reactions occurred is challenging under the current diagnosis coding system used in the National Health Service (NHS). This project addressed two key questions: 1. What are the trends in the occurrence of food hypersensitivity (FHS) reactions and their consequences in terms of healthcare encounters (both to hospital and primary care)? 2. What are the circumstances surrounding severe, life-threatening reactions to food? Approach The researchers used existing NHS datasets (relating to Hospital Admissions, Accident & Emergency visits, Critical Care admissions and Primary care visits) to evaluate healthcare encounters due to food hypersensitivity over the study period. Patient pathways through the healthcare system were also assessed by linking these different datasets. Key Results • Food-induced anaphylaxis represented 29.4% of reported anaphylaxis. admissions, and increased significantly from 1.23 to 4.02 admissions per 100,000 population per annum over the study period. • However, despite an annual increase of 5.7% in hospitalisation for food-induced anaphylaxis between 1998 and 2018, the case fatality rate (proportion of hospital admissions associated with a fatal outcome) more than halved, from 0.7% in 1998 to less than 0.3% in 2018. • 152 deaths were identified during the study period where the cause was very likely to have been food-induced anaphylaxis. • At least 86 (46%) fatalities were triggered by peanut or tree nuts. • Cows’ milk was reported to be the most common cause of fatal anaphylaxis in children aged under 16 years. • Using data from England for the period 2008-2018, the prevalence of food allergy ranged from 4% in preschool-aged children (under 5 years), 1-2% in school-aged children and young people (5 to 20 years) and 0.9% in adults. Although the same methods were used throughout the study period, the statistics presented may be prone to limitations such as miscoding and incomplete datasets. • Prescription of adrenaline auto-injector devices (AAI) are an important risk management intervention in people at risk of food-induced anaphylaxis. However, there is significant under-prescribing of AAI. Data showed that 40% of individuals with prior food-induced anaphylaxis were not prescribed AAI and at least 59% did not have AAI on repeat prescription. • Most healthcare visits for food allergy occurred in general practice. Less than 3% of individuals with a diagnosis of food allergy attended Accident and Emergency during the study period, 2008-2018. Therefore, using hospital data in isolation to analyse patterns of health service utilisation with respect to FHS may not provide a comprehensive overview.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FSA research and evidence.
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46756/001c.122329
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using NHS Data to Monitor Trends in the Occurrence of Severe, Food-Induced Allergic Reactions Work Package 1

Jennifer Kathleen Quint, Alessia Baseggio Conrado, Paul Turner
FSA research and evidence.
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Using NHS Data to Monitor Trends in the Occurrence of Severe, Food-Induced Allergic Reactions Work Package 1

Jennifer Kathleen Quint, Alessia Baseggio Conrado, Paul Turner
article en

Abstract

People with food allergies may experience food allergic reactions due to accidental exposure. These reactions are commonly categorised as non-severe, fatal food anaphylaxis and near-fatal food anaphylaxis. Non-severe allergic reactions to food are more common with an incidence of up to 1,000 times greater than fatal food-related anaphylaxis. However, obtaining accurate data relating to the circumstances under which these reactions occurred is challenging under the current diagnosis coding system used in the National Health Service (NHS). This project addressed two key questions: 1. What are the trends in the occurrence of food hypersensitivity (FHS) reactions and their consequences in terms of healthcare encounters (both to hospital and primary care)? 2. What are the circumstances surrounding severe, life-threatening reactions to food? Approach The researchers used existing NHS datasets (relating to Hospital Admissions, Accident & Emergency visits, Critical Care admissions and Primary care visits) to evaluate healthcare encounters due to food hypersensitivity over the study period. Patient pathways through the healthcare system were also assessed by linking these different datasets. Key Results • Food-induced anaphylaxis represented 29.4% of reported anaphylaxis. admissions, and increased significantly from 1.23 to 4.02 admissions per 100,000 population per annum over the study period. • However, despite an annual increase of 5.7% in hospitalisation for food-induced anaphylaxis between 1998 and 2018, the case fatality rate (proportion of hospital admissions associated with a fatal outcome) more than halved, from 0.7% in 1998 to less than 0.3% in 2018. • 152 deaths were identified during the study period where the cause was very likely to have been food-induced anaphylaxis. • At least 86 (46%) fatalities were triggered by peanut or tree nuts. • Cows’ milk was reported to be the most common cause of fatal anaphylaxis in children aged under 16 years. • Using data from England for the period 2008-2018, the prevalence of food allergy ranged from 4% in preschool-aged children (under 5 years), 1-2% in school-aged children and young people (5 to 20 years) and 0.9% in adults. Although the same methods were used throughout the study period, the statistics presented may be prone to limitations such as miscoding and incomplete datasets. • Prescription of adrenaline auto-injector devices (AAI) are an important risk management intervention in people at risk of food-induced anaphylaxis. However, there is significant under-prescribing of AAI. Data showed that 40% of individuals with prior food-induced anaphylaxis were not prescribed AAI and at least 59% did not have AAI on repeat prescription. • Most healthcare visits for food allergy occurred in general practice. Less than 3% of individuals with a diagnosis of food allergy attended Accident and Emergency during the study period, 2008-2018. Therefore, using hospital data in isolation to analyse patterns of health service utilisation with respect to FHS may not provide a comprehensive overview.

FSA research and evidence.
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.