Perceptions of impure innovation: Health professionals’ experiences and management of stigmatization when working as digital innovators

The healthcare sector has increasingly adopted digital innovations. Nonetheless, medical professionals have also resisted a variety of digital innovations. While the range of factors driving such resistance to innovation are well documented, less clear is how such resistance is experienced and managed by professionals attempting to innovate. We conducted a qualitative study of English and German 'dual-role' professionals, who worked both as clinical practitioners and digital innovators. Inductively theorizing from our interview data, we explain how individual professionals experience different intensities of stigmatization from colleagues when working with digital innovations. We theorize that the more central a dual-role professional is within an organization and the more their innovation deviates from standard professional duties, the more likely the innovation is to be viewed as impure within a professional group and be the target of stigmatization. We identify a range of professional, social, and personal strategies employed by dual-role innovators to manage their experiences of stigmatization and consider the implications for healthcare innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117301
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of impure innovation: Health professionals’ experiences and management of stigmatization when working as digital innovators

Bernard Naughton, S. E. Shaw, Megan Field, Michael Gill
24 citations
Social Science & Medicine
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
17.55
article

Perceptions of impure innovation: Health professionals’ experiences and management of stigmatization when working as digital innovators

Bernard Naughton, S. E. Shaw, Megan Field, Michael Gill
article en
24 citations

Abstract

The healthcare sector has increasingly adopted digital innovations. Nonetheless, medical professionals have also resisted a variety of digital innovations. While the range of factors driving such resistance to innovation are well documented, less clear is how such resistance is experienced and managed by professionals attempting to innovate. We conducted a qualitative study of English and German 'dual-role' professionals, who worked both as clinical practitioners and digital innovators. Inductively theorizing from our interview data, we explain how individual professionals experience different intensities of stigmatization from colleagues when working with digital innovations. We theorize that the more central a dual-role professional is within an organization and the more their innovation deviates from standard professional duties, the more likely the innovation is to be viewed as impure within a professional group and be the target of stigmatization. We identify a range of professional, social, and personal strategies employed by dual-role innovators to manage their experiences of stigmatization and consider the implications for healthcare innovation.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 360
Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Oxford (GB), Independent Dance (GB)
Wellcome Trust, International Seafood Sustainability Foundation
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
17.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.