Developing a High Velocity Dataset Quality Checking Pipeline

ObjectiveThe volume and frequency of refreshed data within the [organisation] has increased significantly since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, a more efficient data quality (DQ) checking process was necessary. Approach Having previously developed an automated DQ checking tool, the focus was on re-engineering the process of DQ task allocation and communication of results. Results 5 analysts were trained in DQ checking. A JIRA workflow tracks the management of data loading. When a dataset is ready for DQ, the Data Manager allocates a ticket to the DQ Lead who then allocates it onto one of the 5 analysts. Via a DQ Slack channel, the analyst is informed and acknowledges receipt of the task. On completion of DQ, the analyst updates the ticket and transfers it to the appropriate workflow stage. Passed DQ tickets are transferred to the Data Manager for data release, whereas failed ones are placed “On Hold”. The DQ Lead triages the issues and liaises with relevant parties for resolution, which may require data amendments. On receipt of amended data, the DQ ticket is transferred back to the queue and the analyst is notified to re-check the data. ConclusionsThe team now complete a high volume of DQ checks efficiently. In 2023, 405 datasets, containing 1716 tables, were quality checked, with the initial DQ taking, on average, 2.6 days. Implications The improved speed of DQ checking ensures projects access the latest available data whilst maintaining the expected DQ levels, integrity and reputation of the TRE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2741
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a High Velocity Dataset Quality Checking Pipeline

Hannah Davies, Muhammad A. Elmessary, Daniel S. Thayer, Lee E. Hughes et al.
1 citations
International Journal for Population Data Science
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.35
article

Developing a High Velocity Dataset Quality Checking Pipeline

Hannah Davies, Muhammad A. Elmessary, Daniel S. Thayer, Lee E. Hughes, Alex-Ioan Coldea, Alexander Makovics, Owen Howell-Wright, Carys Jones, Lorna Evans
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveThe volume and frequency of refreshed data within the [organisation] has increased significantly since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, a more efficient data quality (DQ) checking process was necessary. Approach Having previously developed an automated DQ checking tool, the focus was on re-engineering the process of DQ task allocation and communication of results. Results 5 analysts were trained in DQ checking. A JIRA workflow tracks the management of data loading. When a dataset is ready for DQ, the Data Manager allocates a ticket to the DQ Lead who then allocates it onto one of the 5 analysts. Via a DQ Slack channel, the analyst is informed and acknowledges receipt of the task. On completion of DQ, the analyst updates the ticket and transfers it to the appropriate workflow stage. Passed DQ tickets are transferred to the Data Manager for data release, whereas failed ones are placed “On Hold”. The DQ Lead triages the issues and liaises with relevant parties for resolution, which may require data amendments. On receipt of amended data, the DQ ticket is transferred back to the queue and the analyst is notified to re-check the data. ConclusionsThe team now complete a high volume of DQ checks efficiently. In 2023, 405 datasets, containing 1716 tables, were quality checked, with the initial DQ taking, on average, 2.6 days. Implications The improved speed of DQ checking ensures projects access the latest available data whilst maintaining the expected DQ levels, integrity and reputation of the TRE.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 9(5)
Swansea University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.