Public informed training: Developing a curriculum for trialists using health systems data

IntroductionResearchers are increasingly using health systems data to support clinical trials. A recent Delphi study identified a number of remaining challenges across the trial lifecycle and highlighted opportunities to address them through the development of training resources. Objective and ApproachWe present a programme of work to identify, facilitate and optimise emerging practices for using health systems data in trials, informed by subject matter experts and steered by public input, to begin addressing the ongoing challenges for trial teams. ResultsDirectly addressing a key identified priority for building public trust, we co-developed a series of freely-available online training videos on how public involvement and engagement can impact across the trial lifecycle plus practical tips for such activities. This curriculum was informed by public members who then featured in the training videos. We broadened the training focus to align with trials community needs, whilst retaining the public co-production element. A diverse and purposive group of applicants were selected to contribute to the ongoing work of the HDR UK Transforming Data for Trials workstream. Our presentation reviews how models of involvement have informed our approach including reflections from our public members on what has worked well and what can be improved. We will reflect on the intersection of public involvement in trials and public involvement in healthcare/administrative systems data research. Conclusions & ImplicationsCo-development with a diverse public group ensures all current and future training resources developed reflect a diversity of views, increasing the quality and credibility of materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2718
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public informed training: Developing a curriculum for trialists using health systems data

Kerenza Hood, Rob Trubey, Sarah Rawlinson, Matthew R. Sydes et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Public informed training: Developing a curriculum for trialists using health systems data

Kerenza Hood, Rob Trubey, Sarah Rawlinson, Matthew R. Sydes, Michael Robling, Fiona Lugg‐Widger, Marion Mafham, Victoria Shepherd, Rebecca L. Cannings-John, Nagheen Ahmed, Sadman Islam
article en

Abstract

IntroductionResearchers are increasingly using health systems data to support clinical trials. A recent Delphi study identified a number of remaining challenges across the trial lifecycle and highlighted opportunities to address them through the development of training resources. Objective and ApproachWe present a programme of work to identify, facilitate and optimise emerging practices for using health systems data in trials, informed by subject matter experts and steered by public input, to begin addressing the ongoing challenges for trial teams. ResultsDirectly addressing a key identified priority for building public trust, we co-developed a series of freely-available online training videos on how public involvement and engagement can impact across the trial lifecycle plus practical tips for such activities. This curriculum was informed by public members who then featured in the training videos. We broadened the training focus to align with trials community needs, whilst retaining the public co-production element. A diverse and purposive group of applicants were selected to contribute to the ongoing work of the HDR UK Transforming Data for Trials workstream. Our presentation reviews how models of involvement have informed our approach including reflections from our public members on what has worked well and what can be improved. We will reflect on the intersection of public involvement in trials and public involvement in healthcare/administrative systems data research. Conclusions & ImplicationsCo-development with a diverse public group ensures all current and future training resources developed reflect a diversity of views, increasing the quality and credibility of materials.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 9(5)
University of Oxford (GB), MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.