Identifying homelessness using health administrative data in Ontario, Canada: how coding policies impact case validity

Conducting longitudinal research about the health of people experiencing homelessness poses unique challenges. In Canada, we previously demonstrated that identification through health administrative databases permits population-level studies, despite relatively low sensitivity. Since then, coding of homelessness became mandatory in hospitals nationally. As a result, case validity since 2018 is unknown. We re-validated case definitions for identifying homelessness in health administrative databases between 2018 and 2022 against the longitudinally collected housing history of a representative sample of people experiencing homelessness (n=640) and randomly selected, housed people (n=128,000) in Toronto, Canada. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive likelihood ratios for 42 unique case definitions. We compared the resulting true positives against false positives and false negatives to identify potential causes of misclassification. The optimal case (best sensitivity/scalability beyond Ontario) definition included any indicator during a hospital-based encounter within 180 days of a period of homelessness (sensitivity=52.9%; specificity=99.5%). Among periods of homelessness with ≥1 hospital-based encounter, the optimal case definition had good sensitivity (75.1%) with minimal reduction in specificity (98.5%). Review of false positives suggests homeless status is sometimes improperly carried forward in healthcare encounters occurring after transitioning out of homelessness. Case definitions to identify homelessness using health administrative data exhibit moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity, with two-fold increases in sensitivity since the implementation of mandatory coding in Canada. Mandatory collection of social determinants of health information within administrative data present invaluable opportunities for advancing research on the health and healthcare needs of people experiencing homelessness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2653
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying homelessness using health administrative data in Ontario, Canada: how coding policies impact case validity

Stephen W. Hwang, Lucie Richard, Rosane Nisenbaum, Michael Liu et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

Identifying homelessness using health administrative data in Ontario, Canada: how coding policies impact case validity

Stephen W. Hwang, Lucie Richard, Rosane Nisenbaum, Michael Liu, Brooke Carter
article en

Abstract

Conducting longitudinal research about the health of people experiencing homelessness poses unique challenges. In Canada, we previously demonstrated that identification through health administrative databases permits population-level studies, despite relatively low sensitivity. Since then, coding of homelessness became mandatory in hospitals nationally. As a result, case validity since 2018 is unknown. We re-validated case definitions for identifying homelessness in health administrative databases between 2018 and 2022 against the longitudinally collected housing history of a representative sample of people experiencing homelessness (n=640) and randomly selected, housed people (n=128,000) in Toronto, Canada. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive likelihood ratios for 42 unique case definitions. We compared the resulting true positives against false positives and false negatives to identify potential causes of misclassification. The optimal case (best sensitivity/scalability beyond Ontario) definition included any indicator during a hospital-based encounter within 180 days of a period of homelessness (sensitivity=52.9%; specificity=99.5%). Among periods of homelessness with ≥1 hospital-based encounter, the optimal case definition had good sensitivity (75.1%) with minimal reduction in specificity (98.5%). Review of false positives suggests homeless status is sometimes improperly carried forward in healthcare encounters occurring after transitioning out of homelessness. Case definitions to identify homelessness using health administrative data exhibit moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity, with two-fold increases in sensitivity since the implementation of mandatory coding in Canada. Mandatory collection of social determinants of health information within administrative data present invaluable opportunities for advancing research on the health and healthcare needs of people experiencing homelessness.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 9(5)
Harvard University (US), Unity Health Toronto
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.