Algorithmic Identification of Multiple Sclerosis  in the SAIL databank

BackgroundMultiple Sclerosis (MS) is a challenging disease to identify within large repositories of healthcare data. Diagnosis can be protracted requiring many modalities that may not form part of the repository data collection. Accurate case finding would have multiple applications for studying epidemiology. AimDevelop a case finding algorithm within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank that can reliably elicit Multiple Sclerosis. MethodUtilising a cross sectional cohort study we used multiple datasets within SAIL; General Practice, Inpatient, Outpatient and Office of National Statistics to develop our case finding algorithm based on the coding nomenclatures and timing within these datasets. The results of this algorithm were then tested against two patient data sets: The UK MS Register (n=836), consisting of mostly self confirmed disease and a clinical cohort from South West Wales (n=713). ResultsFrom 4,757,428 records, the algorithm identified 6,194 cases of MS within Wales on 31st December 2020 (prevalence 221.65 [95%CI 216.17–227.24] per 100,000). Case finding sensitivity and specificity was 96.8% and 99.9% for the clinically validated population-based cohort and sensitivity was 96.7% from the self-declared registry population. ConclusionWe successfully identified MS cases within Wales and verified this within two independent data sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2537
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Identification of Multiple Sclerosis  in the SAIL databank

Rod Middleton, Emma Clare Tallantyre, Richard Nicholas, Owen Pearson et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Fault Detection and Control Systems
article

Algorithmic Identification of Multiple Sclerosis  in the SAIL databank

Rod Middleton, Emma Clare Tallantyre, Richard Nicholas, Owen Pearson, Karim L. Kreft, Gillian Ingram, James Witts, Elaine Craig, Ruth Ann Marrie, Sarah Knowles, Neil P. Robertson, Bethan Morgan, Katherine Harding, Jonathon Hawken
article en

Abstract

BackgroundMultiple Sclerosis (MS) is a challenging disease to identify within large repositories of healthcare data. Diagnosis can be protracted requiring many modalities that may not form part of the repository data collection. Accurate case finding would have multiple applications for studying epidemiology. AimDevelop a case finding algorithm within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank that can reliably elicit Multiple Sclerosis. MethodUtilising a cross sectional cohort study we used multiple datasets within SAIL; General Practice, Inpatient, Outpatient and Office of National Statistics to develop our case finding algorithm based on the coding nomenclatures and timing within these datasets. The results of this algorithm were then tested against two patient data sets: The UK MS Register (n=836), consisting of mostly self confirmed disease and a clinical cohort from South West Wales (n=713). ResultsFrom 4,757,428 records, the algorithm identified 6,194 cases of MS within Wales on 31st December 2020 (prevalence 221.65 [95%CI 216.17–227.24] per 100,000). Case finding sensitivity and specificity was 96.8% and 99.9% for the clinically validated population-based cohort and sensitivity was 96.7% from the self-declared registry population. ConclusionWe successfully identified MS cases within Wales and verified this within two independent data sets.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 9(5)
Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB), Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (GB), Swansea University (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.