Right to be forgotten in the Era of large language models: implications, challenges, and solutions

Abstract The Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) was first established as the result of the ruling of Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v AEPD, Mario Costeja González, and was later included as the Right to Erasure under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of European Union to allow individuals the right to request personal data be deleted by organizations. Specifically for search engines, individuals can send requests to organizations to exclude their information from the query results. It was a significant emergent right as the result of the evolution of technology. With the recent development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their use in chatbots, LLM-enabled software systems have become popular. But they are not excluded from the RTBF. Compared with the indexing approach used by search engines, LLMs store, and process information in a completely different way. This poses new challenges for compliance with the RTBF. In this paper, we explore these challenges and provide our insights on how to implement technical solutions for the RTBF, including the use of differential privacy, machine unlearning, model editing, and guardrails. With the rapid advancement of AI and the increasing need of regulating this powerful technology, learning from the case of RTBF can provide valuable lessons for technical practitioners, legal experts, organizations, and authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00573-9
Citations
26
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
101.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Right to be forgotten in the Era of large language models: implications, challenges, and solutions

Mark Staples, Xiwei Xu, Pamela Finckenberg-Broman, Zhenchang Xing et al.
26 citations
AI and Ethics
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
101.85
article

Right to be forgotten in the Era of large language models: implications, challenges, and solutions

Mark Staples, Xiwei Xu, Pamela Finckenberg-Broman, Zhenchang Xing, Dawen Zhang, Shidong Pan, Thong Hoang
article en
26 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) was first established as the result of the ruling of Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v AEPD, Mario Costeja González, and was later included as the Right to Erasure under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of European Union to allow individuals the right to request personal data be deleted by organizations. Specifically for search engines, individuals can send requests to organizations to exclude their information from the query results. It was a significant emergent right as the result of the evolution of technology. With the recent development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their use in chatbots, LLM-enabled software systems have become popular. But they are not excluded from the RTBF. Compared with the indexing approach used by search engines, LLMs store, and process information in a completely different way. This poses new challenges for compliance with the RTBF. In this paper, we explore these challenges and provide our insights on how to implement technical solutions for the RTBF, including the use of differential privacy, machine unlearning, model editing, and guardrails. With the rapid advancement of AI and the increasing need of regulating this powerful technology, learning from the case of RTBF can provide valuable lessons for technical practitioners, legal experts, organizations, and authorities.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(3)
Australian National University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Data61 (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
101.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.