Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Crate

Recording the provenance of scientific computation results is key to the support of traceability, reproducibility and quality assessment of data products. Several data models have been explored to address this need, providing representations of workflow plans and their executions as well as means of packaging the resulting information for archiving and sharing. However, existing approaches tend to lack interoperable adoption across workflow management systems. In this work we present Workflow Run RO-Crate, an extension of RO-Crate (Research Object Crate) and Schema.org to capture the provenance of the execution of computational workflows at different levels of granularity and bundle together all their associated objects (inputs, outputs, code, etc.). The model is supported by a diverse, open community that runs regular meetings, discussing development, maintenance and adoption aspects. Workflow Run RO-Crate is already implemented by several workflow management systems, allowing interoperable comparisons between workflow runs from heterogeneous systems. We describe the model, its alignment to standards such as W3C PROV, and its implementation in six workflow systems. Finally, we illustrate the application of Workflow Run RO-Crate in two use cases of machine learning in the digital image analysis domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309210
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Crate

Hirotaka Suetake, Paul De Geest, Alexander Kanitz, Iacopo Colonnelli et al.
25 citations
PLoS ONE
Scientific Computing and Data Management
26.27
article

Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Crate

Hirotaka Suetake, Paul De Geest, Alexander Kanitz, Iacopo Colonnelli, Matej Gallo, Michael R. Crusoe, Stian Soiland‐Reyes, Daniel Garijo, Simone Leo, Luca Pireddu, Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez, Raül Sirvent, Rudolf Wittner, Renske de Wit, Bruno P. Kinoshita, José M. Fernández, Tazro Ohta, Laura Rodríguez‐Navas
article en
25 citations

Abstract

Recording the provenance of scientific computation results is key to the support of traceability, reproducibility and quality assessment of data products. Several data models have been explored to address this need, providing representations of workflow plans and their executions as well as means of packaging the resulting information for archiving and sharing. However, existing approaches tend to lack interoperable adoption across workflow management systems. In this work we present Workflow Run RO-Crate, an extension of RO-Crate (Research Object Crate) and Schema.org to capture the provenance of the execution of computational workflows at different levels of granularity and bundle together all their associated objects (inputs, outputs, code, etc.). The model is supported by a diverse, open community that runs regular meetings, discussing development, maintenance and adoption aspects. Workflow Run RO-Crate is already implemented by several workflow management systems, allowing interoperable comparisons between workflow runs from heterogeneous systems. We describe the model, its alignment to standards such as W3C PROV, and its implementation in six workflow systems. Finally, we illustrate the application of Workflow Run RO-Crate in two use cases of machine learning in the digital image analysis domain.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(9)
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH), Chiba University (JP), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), University of Basel (CH), Masaryk University (CZ), Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES), Center for Advanced Studies Research and Development in Sardinia (IT), University of Manchester (GB), Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure Consortium (AT), VIB-UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology (BE), Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences (NL), SATO (Japan) (JP), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science (CZ), Research Organization of Information and Systems (JP), University of Turin (IT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES), University of Amsterdam (NL), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Comunidad de Madrid, UK Research and Innovation, European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Regione Autonoma della Sardegna, Vlaamse regering, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Medical Research Council, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, National Bioscience Database Center
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
26.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.