Brain Death Between Jurisprudence and Medical Innovation

This study aims to explore the multiple concepts of brain death through jurisprudence and medical innovation. The study focuses on understanding the interaction between these concepts and analyzing the challenges and problems they face. To analyze the multiple concepts of brain death and provide a comprehensive and balanced understanding of this issue from different perspectives. And also to know the ethical and legal challenges associated with determining brain death. The study included the jurisprudential, medical, ethical and legal community interested in the topic of brain death. The study followed a multidimensional approach and is guided by the methodology of literature review, comparative analysis, and applied analysis of medical trials. Previous studies and research were reviewed, including jurisprudential, medical, ethical and legal studies. The results showed a significant discrepancy in understanding and application between the jurisprudential concept of death and recent medical developments to address the ethical and legal challenges associated with determining brain death. The recommendations and directions for health and legal policies were to achieve harmony between the jurisprudential, medical and ethical dimensions of the issue of brain death. The research indicates the need for further research and analysis to better understand the interaction between the multiple concepts of brain death and to apply comprehensive and balanced solutions.