Integrated Germline and Somatic Features Reveal Divergent Immune Pathways Driving Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer treatment; however, the mechanisms determining patient response remain poorly understood. Here, we used machine learning to predict ICB response from germline and somatic biomarkers and interpreted the learned model to uncover putative mechanisms driving superior outcomes. Patients with higher infiltration of T-follicular helper cells had responses even in the presence of defects in the MHC class-I (MHC-I). Further investigation uncovered different ICB responses in tumors when responses were reliant on MHC-I versus MHC-II neoantigens. Despite similar response rates, MHC II-reliant responses were associated with significantly longer durable clinical benefits (discovery: median overall survival of 63.6 vs. 34.5 months; P = 0.0074; validation: median overall survival of 37.5 vs. 33.1 months; P = 0.040). Characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment reflected MHC neoantigen reliance, and analysis of immune checkpoints revealed LAG3 as a potential target in MHC II-reliant but not MHC I-reliant responses. This study highlights the value of interpretable machine learning models in elucidating the biological basis of therapy responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Immunology Research
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.cir-24-0164
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Germline and Somatic Features Reveal Divergent Immune Pathways Driving Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Meghana S. Pagadala, Ko-Han Lee, JungHo Kong, Andrea Castro et al.
9 citations
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.54
article

Integrated Germline and Somatic Features Reveal Divergent Immune Pathways Driving Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Meghana S. Pagadala, Ko-Han Lee, JungHo Kong, Andrea Castro, Maurizio Zanetti, Scott M. Lippman, Timothy J. Sears, Hannah Carter, Kairi Tanaka
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer treatment; however, the mechanisms determining patient response remain poorly understood. Here, we used machine learning to predict ICB response from germline and somatic biomarkers and interpreted the learned model to uncover putative mechanisms driving superior outcomes. Patients with higher infiltration of T-follicular helper cells had responses even in the presence of defects in the MHC class-I (MHC-I). Further investigation uncovered different ICB responses in tumors when responses were reliant on MHC-I versus MHC-II neoantigens. Despite similar response rates, MHC II-reliant responses were associated with significantly longer durable clinical benefits (discovery: median overall survival of 63.6 vs. 34.5 months; P = 0.0074; validation: median overall survival of 37.5 vs. 33.1 months; P = 0.040). Characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment reflected MHC neoantigen reliance, and analysis of immune checkpoints revealed LAG3 as a potential target in MHC II-reliant but not MHC I-reliant responses. This study highlights the value of interpretable machine learning models in elucidating the biological basis of therapy responses.

Cancer Immunology ResearchVol. 12(12)
Institute of Cancer Research (GB), University of California San Diego (US), University College London (GB)
American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Research Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center, Broad Institute, Mark Foundation For Cancer Research, Stand Up To Cancer, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.