Identification of novel protein biomarkers and therapeutic targets for ankylosing spondylitis using human circulating plasma proteomics and genome analysis

The proteome serves as the primary basis for identifying targets for treatment. This study conducted proteomic range two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to pinpoint potential protein markers and treatment targets for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A total of 4907 data points on circulating protein expression were collected from a large-scale protein quantitative trait locus investigation involving 35,559 individuals. Using data from a Finnish study on AS as the outcome, the dataset comprised 166,144 individuals of European ancestry (1462 cases and 164,682 controls), and causal relationships were determined through bidirectional Mendelian randomization of two samples. Proteins were further validated and identified through single-cell expression analysis, certain cells showing enriched expression levels were detected, and possible treatment targets were optimized. Increased HERC5 expression predicted by genes was related to increased AS risk, whereas the expression of the remaining five circulating proteins, AIF1, CREB3L4, MLN, MRPL55, and SPAG11B, was negatively correlated with AS risk. For each increase in gene-predicted protein levels, the ORs of AS were 2.11 (95% CI 1.44-3.09) for HERC5, 0.14 (95% CI 0.05-0.41) for AIF1, 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.68) for CREB3L4, 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.68) for MLN, 0.23 (95% CI 0.13-0.38) for MRPL55, and 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.39) for SPAG11B. The hypothesis of a reverse causal relationship between these six circulating proteins and AS is not supported. Three of the six protein-coding genes were expressed in both the AS and healthy control groups, while CREB3L4, MLN, and SPAG11B were not detected. Increased levels of HERC5 predicted by genes are related to increased AS risk, whereas the levels of the remaining five circulating proteins, AIF1, CREB3L4, MLN, MRPL55, and SPAG11B, negatively correlate with AS risk. HERC5, AIF1, and MRPL55 are potential therapeutic targets for AS. This study advanced the field by employing a novel combination of proteomic range two-sample MR analysis and single-cell expression analysis to identify potential protein markers and therapeutic targets for AS. This approach enabled a comprehensive understanding of the causal relationships between circulating proteins and AS, which has not been extensively explored in previous studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05521-4
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of novel protein biomarkers and therapeutic targets for ankylosing spondylitis using human circulating plasma proteomics and genome analysis

Xiaopeng Qin, Chengqian Huang, Tianyou Chen, Xinli Zhan et al.
4 citations
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
1.88
article

Identification of novel protein biomarkers and therapeutic targets for ankylosing spondylitis using human circulating plasma proteomics and genome analysis

Xiaopeng Qin, Chengqian Huang, Tianyou Chen, Xinli Zhan, Jichong Zhu, Chong Liu, Shaofeng Wu, Jiang Xue, Jiarui Chen, Sitan Feng, Chenxing Zhou, Zhongxian Zhou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The proteome serves as the primary basis for identifying targets for treatment. This study conducted proteomic range two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to pinpoint potential protein markers and treatment targets for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A total of 4907 data points on circulating protein expression were collected from a large-scale protein quantitative trait locus investigation involving 35,559 individuals. Using data from a Finnish study on AS as the outcome, the dataset comprised 166,144 individuals of European ancestry (1462 cases and 164,682 controls), and causal relationships were determined through bidirectional Mendelian randomization of two samples. Proteins were further validated and identified through single-cell expression analysis, certain cells showing enriched expression levels were detected, and possible treatment targets were optimized. Increased HERC5 expression predicted by genes was related to increased AS risk, whereas the expression of the remaining five circulating proteins, AIF1, CREB3L4, MLN, MRPL55, and SPAG11B, was negatively correlated with AS risk. For each increase in gene-predicted protein levels, the ORs of AS were 2.11 (95% CI 1.44-3.09) for HERC5, 0.14 (95% CI 0.05-0.41) for AIF1, 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.68) for CREB3L4, 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.68) for MLN, 0.23 (95% CI 0.13-0.38) for MRPL55, and 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.39) for SPAG11B. The hypothesis of a reverse causal relationship between these six circulating proteins and AS is not supported. Three of the six protein-coding genes were expressed in both the AS and healthy control groups, while CREB3L4, MLN, and SPAG11B were not detected. Increased levels of HERC5 predicted by genes are related to increased AS risk, whereas the levels of the remaining five circulating proteins, AIF1, CREB3L4, MLN, MRPL55, and SPAG11B, negatively correlate with AS risk. HERC5, AIF1, and MRPL55 are potential therapeutic targets for AS. This study advanced the field by employing a novel combination of proteomic range two-sample MR analysis and single-cell expression analysis to identify potential protein markers and therapeutic targets for AS. This approach enabled a comprehensive understanding of the causal relationships between circulating proteins and AS, which has not been extensively explored in previous studies.

Analytical and Bioanalytical ChemistryVol. 416(28)
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.