Easy listening or driving distraction? The relationship between audiobook complexity level and driving performance on simple routes

• While driving, drivers engage in a range of secondary activities that affect their performance. • When driving in a simple environment, listening to audiobooks may improve performance. • The working memory capacity of drivers and the text complexity of audiobooks have an impact on the outcomes. • Headway variability, steering, and brake response times are all improved by listening to a simple audiobook. • Steering variability and braking times are increased when listening to complex audiobooks. • Drivers with higher working memory capacities benefit the most, but only for simple audiobooks. Drivers engage in a variety of secondary activities while driving. Research suggests that many secondary tasks interfere with driving, making performance worse as compared to single-task driving, but a recent study suggests that in simple environments (low scenery and traffic) listening to an audiobook may actually benefit driving performance. Nonetheless, these effects may vary based on both the textual complexity of the audiobook and the working memory capacity of the driver. In this study, we used a driving simulator to compare single-task driving with that when the driver was listening to an audiobook (dual-task). We manipulated the complexity of the audiobook as measured by Lexile scores (a standard index of text difficulty). Licensed drivers did two 30-minute drives on simple roads, alternating between driving while listening to an audiobook (dual-task) or single-task driving. Drivers did one drive with the simple and the other with the complex audiobook (order counterbalanced). Listening to the simple audiobook improved driving performance as compared to single-task driving: braking response times to hazards were lower, as were steering and headway variability. Conversely, listening to the complex audiobook interfered with driving; braking times to hazards and steering variability were higher when drivers were listening to the audiobook than for single-task driving. Individual differences in working memory capacity as measured by the OSPAN (Operation Span) predicted how much listening to an audiobook benefitted performance, with the highest OSPAN scorers benefitting most, though these OSPAN -related differential benefits were restricted to reduced hazard response times while listening to the simple audiobook.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.002
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Easy listening or driving distraction? The relationship between audiobook complexity level and driving performance on simple routes

Lana M. Trick, Jessica M. Kespe
5 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
1.86
article

Easy listening or driving distraction? The relationship between audiobook complexity level and driving performance on simple routes

Lana M. Trick, Jessica M. Kespe
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• While driving, drivers engage in a range of secondary activities that affect their performance. • When driving in a simple environment, listening to audiobooks may improve performance. • The working memory capacity of drivers and the text complexity of audiobooks have an impact on the outcomes. • Headway variability, steering, and brake response times are all improved by listening to a simple audiobook. • Steering variability and braking times are increased when listening to complex audiobooks. • Drivers with higher working memory capacities benefit the most, but only for simple audiobooks. Drivers engage in a variety of secondary activities while driving. Research suggests that many secondary tasks interfere with driving, making performance worse as compared to single-task driving, but a recent study suggests that in simple environments (low scenery and traffic) listening to an audiobook may actually benefit driving performance. Nonetheless, these effects may vary based on both the textual complexity of the audiobook and the working memory capacity of the driver. In this study, we used a driving simulator to compare single-task driving with that when the driver was listening to an audiobook (dual-task). We manipulated the complexity of the audiobook as measured by Lexile scores (a standard index of text difficulty). Licensed drivers did two 30-minute drives on simple roads, alternating between driving while listening to an audiobook (dual-task) or single-task driving. Drivers did one drive with the simple and the other with the complex audiobook (order counterbalanced). Listening to the simple audiobook improved driving performance as compared to single-task driving: braking response times to hazards were lower, as were steering and headway variability. Conversely, listening to the complex audiobook interfered with driving; braking times to hazards and steering variability were higher when drivers were listening to the audiobook than for single-task driving. Individual differences in working memory capacity as measured by the OSPAN (Operation Span) predicted how much listening to an audiobook benefitted performance, with the highest OSPAN scorers benefitting most, though these OSPAN -related differential benefits were restricted to reduced hazard response times while listening to the simple audiobook.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 107
University of Guelph (CA)
Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.