The shadowy boundaries of obstetric violence
Obstetric violence is a term that has sparked considerable debate. It represents a range of harmful practices around unwanted intimate examinations. This article explores the contested boundaries of obstetric violence, examining both overtly abusive actions and more routine, yet potentially harmful, medical practices during childbirth and beyond. By delving into the underlying patriarchal and misogynistic structures within healthcare, the article challenges traditional understandings of care in childbirth. It argues for a broader, more nuanced recognition of obstetric violence, emphasising its connection to gender-based violence and the need for a more context-sensitive approach in both legal and medical frameworks. The aim is to expand the discourse on obstetric violence to include often overlooked and normalised practices that contribute to the mistreatment and dehumanisation of women, birthing people, and transgender people receiving gender-affirming care.
Authors
- Jonathan Herring (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-3850)
- Camilla Pickles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-4625)
- Marthe Goudsmit Samaritter
Institutions
- Durham University (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Gender-Based Violence
- Published
- 2024-09-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1332/23986808y2024d000000045
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Gender, Security, and Conflict
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.86