The shadowy boundaries of obstetric violence

Obstetric violence is a term that has sparked considerable debate. It represents a range of harmful practices around unwanted intimate examinations. This article explores the contested boundaries of obstetric violence, examining both overtly abusive actions and more routine, yet potentially harmful, medical practices during childbirth and beyond. By delving into the underlying patriarchal and misogynistic structures within healthcare, the article challenges traditional understandings of care in childbirth. It argues for a broader, more nuanced recognition of obstetric violence, emphasising its connection to gender-based violence and the need for a more context-sensitive approach in both legal and medical frameworks. The aim is to expand the discourse on obstetric violence to include often overlooked and normalised practices that contribute to the mistreatment and dehumanisation of women, birthing people, and transgender people receiving gender-affirming care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/23986808y2024d000000045
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The shadowy boundaries of obstetric violence

Jonathan Herring, Camilla Pickles, Marthe Goudsmit Samaritter
2 citations
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Gender, Security, and Conflict
1.86
article

The shadowy boundaries of obstetric violence

Jonathan Herring, Camilla Pickles, Marthe Goudsmit Samaritter
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Obstetric violence is a term that has sparked considerable debate. It represents a range of harmful practices around unwanted intimate examinations. This article explores the contested boundaries of obstetric violence, examining both overtly abusive actions and more routine, yet potentially harmful, medical practices during childbirth and beyond. By delving into the underlying patriarchal and misogynistic structures within healthcare, the article challenges traditional understandings of care in childbirth. It argues for a broader, more nuanced recognition of obstetric violence, emphasising its connection to gender-based violence and the need for a more context-sensitive approach in both legal and medical frameworks. The aim is to expand the discourse on obstetric violence to include often overlooked and normalised practices that contribute to the mistreatment and dehumanisation of women, birthing people, and transgender people receiving gender-affirming care.

Journal of Gender-Based ViolenceVol. 8(3)
Durham University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The shadowy boundaries of obstetric violence — Jonathan Herring, Camilla Pickles, et al. · Journal of Gender-Based Violence (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS