Sharing procedural knowledge in manual work environments: Material-bodily actions as explanatory resources in construction-site interactions

The study examines the use of material objects constituting material-bodily actions in explanation sequences in construction-site interactions. Using multimodal Conversation Analysis as a method, it investigates the explanatory role of such actions and their sequential environments, comparing their application with gestural depiction. The analysis demonstrates that material-bodily actions are employed when the matter of explanation requires a focus on the details of prerequisite manual actions and when additional troubles emerge during the explanation. By using material-bodily actions, speakers direct recipients' attention to the salience of spatial accuracy to ensure understanding of the procedural order. The study discusses the interactional differences between gestural depiction and the employment of material objects as explanatory resources. • Explanation sequences are one method of dealing with troubles on construction sites. • Explainers use gestural depictions and material objects as explanatory resources. • By employing objects, explainers constitute material-bodily actions. • Material-bodily actions come in response to additional troubles during explanations. • Material-bodily actions are used when spatial accuracy matters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language & Communication
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.08.004
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sharing procedural knowledge in manual work environments: Material-bodily actions as explanatory resources in construction-site interactions

Paweł Urbanik
3 citations
Language & Communication
Speech and dialogue systems
1.04
article

Sharing procedural knowledge in manual work environments: Material-bodily actions as explanatory resources in construction-site interactions

Paweł Urbanik
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The study examines the use of material objects constituting material-bodily actions in explanation sequences in construction-site interactions. Using multimodal Conversation Analysis as a method, it investigates the explanatory role of such actions and their sequential environments, comparing their application with gestural depiction. The analysis demonstrates that material-bodily actions are employed when the matter of explanation requires a focus on the details of prerequisite manual actions and when additional troubles emerge during the explanation. By using material-bodily actions, speakers direct recipients' attention to the salience of spatial accuracy to ensure understanding of the procedural order. The study discusses the interactional differences between gestural depiction and the employment of material objects as explanatory resources. • Explanation sequences are one method of dealing with troubles on construction sites. • Explainers use gestural depictions and material objects as explanatory resources. • By employing objects, explainers constitute material-bodily actions. • Material-bodily actions come in response to additional troubles during explanations. • Material-bodily actions are used when spatial accuracy matters.

Language & CommunicationVol. 99
University of Oslo (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Speech and dialogue systems
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.