Impact of Clevidipine Versus Nicardipine on Time in Range when Lowering Blood Pressure

<b>Background:</b> Two intravenous medications commonly used as first-line therapy for rapid blood pressure control are nicardipine and clevidipine, both of which are available as titratable infusions. Despite pharmacokinetic differences, no data clearly support a preferred agent. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes associated with current use of these medications across a variety of indications in a hospital system. <b>Methods:</b> This study was a multi-center, retrospective chart review conducted within a hospital system from June 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. Records of patients were matched in a one-to-one fashion based on indication for blood pressure control and similar pre-intervention blood pressure. The primary outcome was time within target blood pressure range. <b>Results:</b> A total of 569 patients were screened, resulting in 100 matched pairs. The percent of time in blood pressure range was similar between nicardipine and clevidipine when stratified by location of care (51.5% vs 51.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.970 for ED; 68.1% vs 68.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.913 for ICU). Overall, the median (IQR) time to target blood pressure range was significantly faster with clevidipine than nicardipine [20 (7-43) min. vs 34 (14.5-57) min., resp.; <i>P</i> = 0.013). There were numerically higher rates of hypotension with nicardipine than clevidipine, but this finding was not significant (17% vs 10%; <i>P</i> = 0.093). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study shows a statistically significant difference in time to target blood pressure range with clevidipine compared to nicardipine. Although there was no difference in the percentage of time in blood pressure range, nicardipine was associated with a non-significant increase in the incidence of hypotension.