Assessment Center Evaluation in Indonesia: An Exploratory Study

Although assessment center practice continues to spread to Asian countries, no published study exists that evaluates the quality of AC within the largest populous country of Indonesia. Therefore, this study aims to determine the quality of assessment center methodology in Indonesia. Then, the result is compared to a prior benchmarking of the BACDi-instrument. The results indicate no differences between Indonesian and German assessment centers' overall development and post-processing quality phases. The difference between Indonesian and German assessment centers was found in conduction quality. The assessment center practice has to consider the context of other aspects that could lead to its methodology improvement in future practice. This study is the first detailed and standardized representation of assessment center methodology quality that adequately explains every phase within the assessment center in Indonesia, and more widely, is discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RSF Conference Series Business Management and Social Sciences
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31098/bmss.v4i1.869
Primary Topic
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment Center Evaluation in Indonesia: An Exploratory Study

Seger Handoyo, Jens Nachtwei, Endah Mastuti, Mike A. K. Lovihan
RSF Conference Series Business Management and Social Sciences
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
article

Assessment Center Evaluation in Indonesia: An Exploratory Study

Seger Handoyo, Jens Nachtwei, Endah Mastuti, Mike A. K. Lovihan
article en

Abstract

Although assessment center practice continues to spread to Asian countries, no published study exists that evaluates the quality of AC within the largest populous country of Indonesia. Therefore, this study aims to determine the quality of assessment center methodology in Indonesia. Then, the result is compared to a prior benchmarking of the BACDi-instrument. The results indicate no differences between Indonesian and German assessment centers' overall development and post-processing quality phases. The difference between Indonesian and German assessment centers was found in conduction quality. The assessment center practice has to consider the context of other aspects that could lead to its methodology improvement in future practice. This study is the first detailed and standardized representation of assessment center methodology quality that adequately explains every phase within the assessment center in Indonesia, and more widely, is discussed.

RSF Conference Series Business Management and Social SciencesVol. 4(1)
Universitas Airlangga (ID), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment Center Evaluation in Indonesia: An Exploratory Study — Seger Handoyo, Jens Nachtwei, et al. · RSF Conference Series Business Management and Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS