Developing a process for assessing the safety of a digital mental health intervention and gaining regulatory approval: a case study and academic’s guide

The example shared in this paper serves as a guide for academics and professionals working in the field of digital mental health. It provides insights into the safety assessment requirements of regulatory bodies when a clinical investigation of a digital mental health intervention is proposed. Methods, scales and tools that could easily be adapted for use in other similar research are presented, with the expectation that these will assist other researchers in the field seeking regulatory approval for digital mental health products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08421-1
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a process for assessing the safety of a digital mental health intervention and gaining regulatory approval: a case study and academic’s guide

Pamela Charlotte Jacobsen, Neha Gupta, Jeroen Keppens, Emmanuelle Peters et al.
10 citations
Trials
Digital Mental Health Interventions
4.10
article

Developing a process for assessing the safety of a digital mental health intervention and gaining regulatory approval: a case study and academic’s guide

Pamela Charlotte Jacobsen, Neha Gupta, Jeroen Keppens, Emmanuelle Peters, Jenny Yiend, Che-Wei Hsu, Rayan Taher, Sukhwinder S. Shergill, Clare Heaysman, Charlotte L Hall, Thomas Kabir, Aislinn Bergin, Daniel Ståhl, Philip K. McGuire, Ben Wensley Stock, Nayan Kalnad
article en
10 citations

Abstract

The example shared in this paper serves as a guide for academics and professionals working in the field of digital mental health. It provides insights into the safety assessment requirements of regulatory bodies when a clinical investigation of a digital mental health intervention is proposed. Methods, scales and tools that could easily be adapted for use in other similar research are presented, with the expectation that these will assist other researchers in the field seeking regulatory approval for digital mental health products.

TrialsVol. 25(1)
Department of Health and Social Care (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), Medway School of Pharmacy (GB), King's College London (GB), Wiltshire College (GB), University of Oxford (GB), King's College School (GB), NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative (GB), McPin Foundation (GB), Kent and Medway Medical School, University of Bath (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, King's College London, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.