Foam density measurement using a 3D scanner

In this work, we used a 3D scanner for the volume measurement of foamed samples, a long-standing problem in the density evaluation of foams. The 3D scanning density measurement method can be selected as an alternative to or in combination with well-established, classical methods that involve the use of instruments like a caliper, a pycnometer, or other devices based on displacement or flotation principles. In particular, the classical methods show some limitations when the foamed sample geometry is irregular, when the polymer is highly hygroscopic, and when it has open porosities. We have tested numerous foamed samples of different sizes, shapes, densities, materials, and morphologies. We utilized different 3D scanner configurations for their volume measurement and compared the results with geometrical and displacement methods, when possible. Results showed that the proposed method is highly accurate, reproducible, and simple, although some specific precautions should be put in place to avoid misinterpretation by the shape-reconstructing software.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cellular Plastics
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x241281880
Primary Topic
Polymer Foaming and Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foam density measurement using a 3D scanner

Ernesto Di Maio, Fabrizio Errichiello, Daniele Amato, Mario Penati
1 links
Journal of Cellular Plastics
Polymer Foaming and Composites
article

Foam density measurement using a 3D scanner

Ernesto Di Maio, Fabrizio Errichiello, Daniele Amato, Mario Penati
article en

Abstract

In this work, we used a 3D scanner for the volume measurement of foamed samples, a long-standing problem in the density evaluation of foams. The 3D scanning density measurement method can be selected as an alternative to or in combination with well-established, classical methods that involve the use of instruments like a caliper, a pycnometer, or other devices based on displacement or flotation principles. In particular, the classical methods show some limitations when the foamed sample geometry is irregular, when the polymer is highly hygroscopic, and when it has open porosities. We have tested numerous foamed samples of different sizes, shapes, densities, materials, and morphologies. We utilized different 3D scanner configurations for their volume measurement and compared the results with geometrical and displacement methods, when possible. Results showed that the proposed method is highly accurate, reproducible, and simple, although some specific precautions should be put in place to avoid misinterpretation by the shape-reconstructing software.

Journal of Cellular Plastics
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Polymer Foaming and Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Foam density measurement using a 3D scanner — Ernesto Di Maio, Fabrizio Errichiello, et al. · Journal of Cellular Plastics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS