Ensquared Energy and Optical Centroid Efficiency in Optical Sensors: Part 2, Primary Aberrations

We previously proposed that the optical centroid efficiency (OCE) might be a preferred figure-of-merit to the enclosed energy of a rectangular pixel (EOD) for an instrument subject to unpredictable environmental jitter and alignment conditions. Here we follow the same symbols for the corresponding quantities, particularly the width of the pixel as being equal to 2d. Here we analyze the performance of the OCE vs. the EOD for the three Seidel primary aberrations of an optical component: spherical, coma, and astigmatism, plus defocus. We show that the OCE has an approximate U-shape when graphed against the EOD, for the aberrations ranging from 0 to 1.25λ. We conclude that for pixels larger than 2d = 3λF/#, a small pixel will feature better performance when expecting jitter, misalignment, and other environmental and unpredictable conditions. When evaluating the performance of low-aberration instruments in dynamic and unpredictable environments, the choice of the lager pixel 2d = 7λF/# might be advantageous. Its selection will result in the deterioration of image resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Photonics
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11090855
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensquared Energy and Optical Centroid Efficiency in Optical Sensors: Part 2, Primary Aberrations

Yaujen Wang, Marija Strojnik, Robert N. Martin
2 citations
Photonics
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
0.68
article

Ensquared Energy and Optical Centroid Efficiency in Optical Sensors: Part 2, Primary Aberrations

Yaujen Wang, Marija Strojnik, Robert N. Martin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We previously proposed that the optical centroid efficiency (OCE) might be a preferred figure-of-merit to the enclosed energy of a rectangular pixel (EOD) for an instrument subject to unpredictable environmental jitter and alignment conditions. Here we follow the same symbols for the corresponding quantities, particularly the width of the pixel as being equal to 2d. Here we analyze the performance of the OCE vs. the EOD for the three Seidel primary aberrations of an optical component: spherical, coma, and astigmatism, plus defocus. We show that the OCE has an approximate U-shape when graphed against the EOD, for the aberrations ranging from 0 to 1.25λ. We conclude that for pixels larger than 2d = 3λF/#, a small pixel will feature better performance when expecting jitter, misalignment, and other environmental and unpredictable conditions. When evaluating the performance of low-aberration instruments in dynamic and unpredictable environments, the choice of the lager pixel 2d = 7λF/# might be advantageous. Its selection will result in the deterioration of image resolution.

PhotonicsVol. 11(9)
Arcadia (US), Film Independent (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.