Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dropout in Diabetic Patients with Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

This study aims to compare meibomian gland (MG) dropout and MG dysfunction (MGD) between patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with moderate-severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and patients with no diabetes (NDM). This prospective, transversal, age, and gender-matched case-control study included 98 DM and 106 NDM eyes. Dry eye disease (DED) and MGD evaluations were performed, including meibography (Keratograph 5M<sup>®</sup>). The objective MG dropout percentage was obtained by analyzing meibography images with ImageJ software (v. 1.52o, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and was subsequently graded with Arita's meiboscore. The DM duration was 18 ± 9 years. The mean meiboscore (3.8 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001), meiboscore severity (<i>p</i> = 0.016), and MG dropout (45.1 ± 0.1% vs. 39.0 ± 0.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were greater in DM than in NDM. All patients showed MG dropout (meiboscore > 1). Lower eyelids showed greater MG dropout in both groups. A correlation with age (r = 0.178, <i>p</i> = 0.014) and no correlations with DM duration or gender (<i>p</i> > 0.005) were observed. Patients with diabetes showed greater corneal staining (1.7 ± 1.3 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), reduced corneal sensitivity (5.4 ± 1.1 vs. 5.9 ± 0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower MG expressibility (3. 9 ± 1.6 vs. 4.4 ± 2.1; <i>p</i> = 0.017), and worse meibum quality (1.9 ± 0.8 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5; <i>p</i> = 0.019). Tear breakup time, osmolarity, MMP-9, Schirmer, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index showed no significant differences. In conclusion, patients with DM with NPDR have greater MG dropout and meiboscore, as well as more severe MGD and DED parameters than persons with NDM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11090907
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dropout in Diabetic Patients with Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Fernando Morales-Wong, Sergio Antonio Corral-Benavides, Karim Mohamed‐Noriega, Gerardo Esteban Cepeda-Ortegón et al.
3 citations
Bioengineering
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.63
article

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dropout in Diabetic Patients with Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Fernando Morales-Wong, Sergio Antonio Corral-Benavides, Karim Mohamed‐Noriega, Gerardo Esteban Cepeda-Ortegón, Jibran Mohamed-Noriega, Marissa Fernandez, Jesús Mohamed-Hamsho, Braulio Hernán Velasco-Sepúlveda, Carla Sofía González-Arocha, Jonathan Octavio Rodríguez-Cuevas, José Francisco Martínez-Delgado
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aims to compare meibomian gland (MG) dropout and MG dysfunction (MGD) between patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with moderate-severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and patients with no diabetes (NDM). This prospective, transversal, age, and gender-matched case-control study included 98 DM and 106 NDM eyes. Dry eye disease (DED) and MGD evaluations were performed, including meibography (Keratograph 5M<sup>®</sup>). The objective MG dropout percentage was obtained by analyzing meibography images with ImageJ software (v. 1.52o, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and was subsequently graded with Arita's meiboscore. The DM duration was 18 ± 9 years. The mean meiboscore (3.8 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001), meiboscore severity (<i>p</i> = 0.016), and MG dropout (45.1 ± 0.1% vs. 39.0 ± 0.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were greater in DM than in NDM. All patients showed MG dropout (meiboscore > 1). Lower eyelids showed greater MG dropout in both groups. A correlation with age (r = 0.178, <i>p</i> = 0.014) and no correlations with DM duration or gender (<i>p</i> > 0.005) were observed. Patients with diabetes showed greater corneal staining (1.7 ± 1.3 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), reduced corneal sensitivity (5.4 ± 1.1 vs. 5.9 ± 0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower MG expressibility (3. 9 ± 1.6 vs. 4.4 ± 2.1; <i>p</i> = 0.017), and worse meibum quality (1.9 ± 0.8 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5; <i>p</i> = 0.019). Tear breakup time, osmolarity, MMP-9, Schirmer, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index showed no significant differences. In conclusion, patients with DM with NPDR have greater MG dropout and meiboscore, as well as more severe MGD and DED parameters than persons with NDM.

BioengineeringVol. 11(9)
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX)
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.