The potential of local exhaust combined with mixing and displacement ventilation systems to mitigate COVID-19 transmission risks

The performance of two types of air diffusers, a perforated duct and a low-velocity unit coupled with local exhausts, on airborne transmission and cross-infection was investigated in a meeting room. The effect of air diffusers’ locations on airborne transmission was investigated. Six local exhausts were installed above six workstations at 2.0 m height. Respiratory-generated airborne pathogens were simulated using SF 6 in the exhaled air of the manikin acting as an infected person. The SF 6 concentration in the inhaled air of five susceptible persons remained steady with perforated duct located on the ceiling and at 1.7 m height attached to the corridor wall, but fluctuated greatly when perforated duct were located on the floor, although with a much lower concentration level. The perforated duct under the warm window showed the best potential for mitigating airborne transmission. The concentration in the inhaled air was varied with horizontally supplied low-velocity unit, but much steadier with low-velocity unit at 1.7 m attached to the wall. With an adjusted airflow pattern from low-velocity unit, the inhaled concentration was much lower and uniform among the five susceptible persons. The contaminant removal effectiveness (CRE) was 4.3 with perforated duct under a warm window on the floor. With an adjusted airflow pattern from low-velocity unit, the CRE was much more consistent and increased from 2.1 to 3.9 with an airflow rate from 61 l/s to 116 l/s. The infection probability was the lowest with the perforated duct on the floor and adjusted low-velocity unit. • Analysis of airborne transmission with local exhausts in a meeting room. • The effect of air diffusers' locations with local exhaust on cross-infection is studied. • The inhaled concentration is fluctuated but lower with perforated duct on the floor. • The inhaled concentration was lower and uniform with adjusted low-velocity unit. • Perforated duct on the floor and adjusted low-velocity unit showed the best performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112076
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The potential of local exhaust combined with mixing and displacement ventilation systems to mitigate COVID-19 transmission risks

Weixin Zhao, Simo Kilpeläinen, Risto Kosonen, Juha Jokisalo et al.
8 citations
Building and Environment
Infection Control and Ventilation
3.35
article

The potential of local exhaust combined with mixing and displacement ventilation systems to mitigate COVID-19 transmission risks

Weixin Zhao, Simo Kilpeläinen, Risto Kosonen, Juha Jokisalo, Muhammad Farhan Ejaz
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The performance of two types of air diffusers, a perforated duct and a low-velocity unit coupled with local exhausts, on airborne transmission and cross-infection was investigated in a meeting room. The effect of air diffusers’ locations on airborne transmission was investigated. Six local exhausts were installed above six workstations at 2.0 m height. Respiratory-generated airborne pathogens were simulated using SF 6 in the exhaled air of the manikin acting as an infected person. The SF 6 concentration in the inhaled air of five susceptible persons remained steady with perforated duct located on the ceiling and at 1.7 m height attached to the corridor wall, but fluctuated greatly when perforated duct were located on the floor, although with a much lower concentration level. The perforated duct under the warm window showed the best potential for mitigating airborne transmission. The concentration in the inhaled air was varied with horizontally supplied low-velocity unit, but much steadier with low-velocity unit at 1.7 m attached to the wall. With an adjusted airflow pattern from low-velocity unit, the inhaled concentration was much lower and uniform among the five susceptible persons. The contaminant removal effectiveness (CRE) was 4.3 with perforated duct under a warm window on the floor. With an adjusted airflow pattern from low-velocity unit, the CRE was much more consistent and increased from 2.1 to 3.9 with an airflow rate from 61 l/s to 116 l/s. The infection probability was the lowest with the perforated duct on the floor and adjusted low-velocity unit. • Analysis of airborne transmission with local exhausts in a meeting room. • The effect of air diffusers' locations with local exhaust on cross-infection is studied. • The inhaled concentration is fluctuated but lower with perforated duct on the floor. • The inhaled concentration was lower and uniform with adjusted low-velocity unit. • Perforated duct on the floor and adjusted low-velocity unit showed the best performance.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 266
Academy of Finland, Työsuojelurahasto
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Infection Control and Ventilation
3.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.